BharatTax.co — Knowledge Portal

GST · Guide

Answering a DRC-01C: Credit Above GSTR-2B (Rule 88D)

A DRC-01C usually arrives by email a day or two after GSTR-3B is filed, and it is often noticed only when GSTR-1 for the next month will not go through. The intimation says that the credit claimed in the return is more than GSTR-2B made available, and asks for payment o…

Published 12 October 2026

A DRC-01C usually arrives by email a day or two after GSTR-3B is filed, and it is often noticed only when GSTR-1 for the next month will not go through. The intimation says that the credit claimed in the return is more than GSTR-2B made available, and asks for payment or an explanation within seven days. Many of the differences it picks up are legitimate: credit taken in a later month because the goods arrived late, a reclaim of credit reversed earlier, credit on imports or reverse charge. The intimation does not know which. The reply is the place to say so, and it is also what unlocks GSTR-1.

This guide covers the procedure: what triggers the intimation, how Part B is answered, the seven days, the block on GSTR-1, and what can follow. How GSTR-2B is built is covered in The Invoice Management System and GSTR-2B. Reconciling purchases against it is covered in Reconciling Purchases with GSTR-2B. The rows of table 4 are covered in Reporting Credit in GSTR-3B Table 4.

What triggers the intimation

Rule 88D was inserted by Notification No. 38/2023-Central Tax of 4 August 2023. It applies where the credit availed in GSTR-3B for a tax period “exceeds the input tax credit available to such person in accordance with the auto-generated statement … in FORM GSTR-2B in respect of the said tax period”, by “such amount and such percentage, as may be recommended by the Council”.

The amount and percentage are not published. They are not in the rule, in any notification or in the GST portal’s user manual for DRC-01C, which refers only to “a pre-defined limit”. GSTN’s advisory introducing the facility, issued in October 2023, said that intimations would issue where claimed credit exceeds GSTR-2B “by predefined limits, as directed by competent authority”. Figures quoted elsewhere are not sourced to any primary text.

Two points follow from the rule’s wording:

  • The comparison is period by period. Credit taken in October for an invoice that appeared in September’s GSTR-2B will look like an excess in October.
  • The comparison is with GSTR-2B as generated. It is not the purchase register. Credit that never appears in GSTR-2B can produce an excess even when it is properly claimed. Examples are reverse charge credit on purchases from unregistered persons and on imports of services, and reclaims of earlier reversals. Whether the portal adjusts for each of these before comparing is not stated in the manual.

The portal’s FAQs say DRC-01C applies to normal taxpayers, including SEZ units and developers, to casual taxable persons, and to those who have left the composition scheme. For quarterly filers under QRMP, it is generated after the quarterly GSTR-3B; for monthly filers, after each monthly return.

What to have ready

Item Where it comes from
The intimation, with its reference number Email and SMS; on the portal under Services > Returns > Return Compliance > ITC Mismatch (DRC-01C)
GSTR-2B for the period, and for earlier periods where credit was deferred Portal
Table 4 of the GSTR-3B filed for the period Return
A reconciliation of the purchase register with GSTR-2B, invoice by invoice Books, matched with the portal download
Bills of entry for imports, and SEZ bills of entry ICEGATE and the books
Self-invoices and payment for reverse charge supplies Books and table 3.1(d) of GSTR-3B
The Electronic Credit Reversal and Re-claimed Statement Portal
Proof of payment to suppliers, where credit reversed under rule 37 is being reclaimed Books and bank
The electronic credit ledger for the period Portal

The form: Part A and Part B

Part A is system-generated and “does not require signature”. It sets out, head by head (integrated, central, State or Union territory tax, and cess), the credit in GSTR-2B, the credit in GSTR-3B, and the “excess input tax credit availed”. It asks the person to pay the excess with interest through FORM GST DRC-03 and/or to give reasons in Part B, within seven days.

Part B is the reply. It has two parts, and either or both may be used:

  • A. Payment. The ARN of a DRC-03 through which the excess, or part of it, has been paid with interest under section 50. The portal’s manual lists the conditions on which it validates the ARN. The DRC-03 must be filed on or after the date Part A was issued. The cause of payment must be “ITC mismatch – GSTR-2A/2B to GSTR-3B”. Its period must match the intimation: the same month for monthly filers, and at least one month of the quarter for quarterly filers.
  • B. Reasons. For the part not paid, the form lists the reasons a person may select, with “Details (Mandatory)” against each:
    1. credit not availed in earlier periods because the goods or services were not received in that period, including goods received in instalments
    2. credit not availed in earlier periods by mistake or omission
    3. credit on imports of goods not reflected in GSTR-2B
    4. credit on inward supplies from an SEZ not reflected in GSTR-2B
    5. excess reversal in earlier periods, reclaimed now
    6. re-credit after paying the supplier, of credit reversed under rule 37
    7. re-credit after the supplier files its return, of credit reversed under rule 37A
    8. GSTR-3B filed with incorrect details, to be amended in the next period
    9. any other reason, to be specified

The manual allows up to 500 characters of explanation for each reason selected. A reason ticked without an explanation is rejected by the portal.

Seven days, and the block on GSTR-1

Rule 88D(1) requires the person to pay or explain “within a period of seven days”. The period runs from the intimation.

The consequence of not replying is in rule 59(6)(e), inserted by the same Notification No. 38/2023-Central Tax. A person to whom an intimation has issued “shall not be allowed to furnish the details of outward supplies … in FORM GSTR-1 or using the invoice furnishing facility for a subsequent tax period”. The bar lasts until the person has either paid the excess “or has furnished a reply explaining the reasons in respect of the amount of excess input tax credit that still remains to be paid”.

The bar is lifted by filing the reply, not by the officer accepting it. The portal’s FAQs say GSTR-1 or IFF can be filed “instantly” after Part B is filed. A late reply also lifts it: the rule bars GSTR-1 until a reply is filed, and does not stop a reply after the seven days. But a late GSTR-1 carries its own late fee, and GSTR-3B for the following period depends on GSTR-1. Both are covered in Late Returns.

Portal steps

The portal’s user manual for DRC-01C describes the reply as follows:

  1. Log in and go to Services > Returns > Return Compliance, and click View on the ITC Mismatch (DRC-01C) tile. Pending intimations can be searched by reference number, return period or status.
  2. Open the reference number. Part A and Part B are shown, and Part A can be downloaded as a PDF.
  3. Where an amount is being paid, use the link to DRC-03, pay with the cause “ITC mismatch – GSTR-2A/2B to GSTR-3B”, then enter and validate the ARN in Part B.
  4. For any amount not paid, select each reason that applies and explain it.
  5. Tick the declaration, select the authorised signatory and enter the place, then save. A preview can be downloaded.
  6. File with EVC or DSC. For EVC, an OTP goes to the email and mobile of the primary authorised signatory.

The filed form can then be downloaded from the same page, with its status shown as “Completed”.

Who signs

Part B carries a verification by the authorised signatory, with name, designation and place. The portal accepts an EVC or a DSC.

What follows the reply

Rule 88D does not provide for an order accepting or rejecting the reply. Sub-rule (3) states what follows instead. Where any amount remains unpaid after seven days, and either no explanation has been given or the explanation “is not found to be acceptable by the proper officer”, that amount “shall be liable to be demanded in accordance with the provisions of section 73 or section 74 or section 74A”. The reference to section 74A was added from 1 November 2024 by Notification No. 20/2024-Central Tax. Section 74A governs demands for 2024-25 onwards; sections 73 and 74 govern earlier years. The demand procedure, from DRC-01A to the order, is in Notices and Demands. The reply on the portal becomes part of the record in any such proceeding.

Interest. Section 50(3) charges interest only where credit has been “wrongly availed and utilised”, at 18 per cent. That rate is in Notification No. 13/2017-Central Tax, as amended by the Finance Act, 2022 with effect from 1 July 2017. Under rule 88B(3), credit is treated as utilised when the balance in the credit ledger falls below the wrongly availed amount. Interest runs from that date until the credit is reversed or the tax is paid. An excess that was never used carries no interest under section 50(3).

Penalty. For 2024-25 onwards, section 74A(8) allows a person whose case does not involve fraud, wilful misstatement or suppression to pay the tax and interest before a notice is served, or within sixty days of the notice, and “no penalty shall be payable”. Otherwise section 74A(5)(i) fixes the penalty at ten per cent of the tax or ten thousand rupees, whichever is higher. For earlier years, section 73(5) and (6) give the same result for payment before a notice, and section 73(8) for payment within thirty days of it.

What can still be put right

  • A genuine excess can be paid through DRC-03 with interest at any time, and the ARN can be quoted in Part B. Credit wrongly taken and still unused can also be reversed. Correcting Mistakes in Returns sets out what section 39(9) allows after a return is filed. Section 39(9) does not apply to errors found “as a result of scrutiny, audit, inspection or enforcement activity”.
  • A timing difference is explained, not paid. Examples are credit taken in a later month because the goods arrived late, a reclaim of a rule 37 or 37A reversal, or credit on imports. The supporting details matter: invoice numbers, the GSTR-2B period in which each invoice appeared, and bill of entry numbers.
  • Credit that is time-barred under section 16(4) cannot be cured by any reply. The time limits are covered in Time Limits for Claiming Credit.
  • Repeated intimations for the same pattern often point to a reconciliation gap, which is dealt with month by month in Claiming Input Tax Credit Month by Month.

The procedure in order

  1. Open the intimation from the Return Compliance page and download Part A.
  2. Reconcile the excess, head by head, against GSTR-2B for the period and for earlier periods, and against the books.
  3. Split the excess into what is genuinely excess and what is a timing or structural difference.
  4. Pay the genuine excess with interest through DRC-03, under the cause “ITC mismatch – GSTR-2A/2B to GSTR-3B”.
  5. In Part B, quote and validate the DRC-03 ARN, and select and explain a reason for every amount not paid.
  6. File Part B with EVC or DSC within seven days. GSTR-1 or IFF for the next period can then be filed.
  7. Keep the reconciliation. It is the answer to any later notice under section 73, 74 or 74A.

The next guide covers the other route by which a credit discrepancy reaches the department: scrutiny of returns, and the reply in ASMT-11.