☐ Has the input been identified? ☐ Has business-use nexus been verified? ☐ If partial business-use, has sub-s. (1) Rule 42 been applied? ☐ If mixed taxable / exempt, has sub-s. (2) been applied? ☐ Has exempt-supply scope (sub-s. (3)) been…
17
☐ Has the input been identified? ☐ Has business-use nexus been verified? ☐ If partial business-use, has sub-s. (1) Rule 42 been applied? ☐ If mixed taxable / exempt, has sub-s. (2) been applied? ☐ Has exempt-supply scope (sub-s. (3)) been…
Section 17 apportionment / blocked credits — checklist (19 items)
Section 17 apportionment / blocked credits — checklist (19 items)
☐ Has the input been identified?
☐ Has business-use nexus been verified?
☐ If partial business-use, has sub-s. (1) Rule 42 been applied?
☐ If mixed taxable / exempt, has sub-s. (2) been applied?
☐ Has exempt-supply scope (sub-s. (3)) been verified?
☐ For banks / NBFC, has sub-s. (4) option been considered?
☐ Has sub-s. (5) blocked-credit analysis been done?
☐ For each blocked category, have exceptions been verified?
☐ For construction-inputs, has Safari Retreats + FA 2024 framework been applied?
☐ For capital goods, has Rule 43 60-month framework been applied?
☐ Have Rule 42 / 43 computations been performed?
☐ Has documentary trail of analysis been preserved?
☐ Has Safari Retreats / s. 11A monitoring been done?
☐ Has Bharti Airtel substance-over-form discipline been applied?
☐ Has Dilip Kumar strict-construction discipline been considered?
☐ Has Mafatlal procedural-fairness framework been observed?
☐ Has Mohit Minerals constitutional framework been applied?
☐ Has audit-defensibility through s. 17 file been ensured?
☐ Has the file been reviewed for audit-defensibility?
Worked examples — five live scenarios
Example 1 — Mixed taxable / exempt apportionment
Facts: Hospital supplies (a) exempt healthcare services Rs. 6 crore; (b) taxable non-healthcare services (e.g., pharmacy retail) Rs. 4 crore. Total Rs. 10 crore. Common inputs ITC Rs. 1 lakh.
Analysis: Sub-s. (2) — Rule 42. Common ITC reversal = Rs. 1 lakh × (Rs. 6 crore / Rs. 10 crore) = Rs. 60,000. Net ITC = Rs. 40,000.
Result: Rule 42 apportionment operative.
Example 2 — Motor vehicle blocked
Facts: Taxpayer buys car (5-seater) for office use. GST paid Rs. 1.8 lakh.
Analysis: Sub-s. (5)(a) — motor vehicle for passenger transport (≤13 seats). ITC blocked. Exceptions (further supply, passenger transport, driving school) don't apply.
Result: ITC blocked. Cost to taxpayer.
Example 3 — Construction-input under Safari Retreats
Facts: Commercial-property developer built office building, claimed ITC on construction-inputs pre-October 2024.
Analysis: Sub-s. (5)(d) bar — Safari Retreats SC + FA 2024 retrospective amendment. Pre-amendment liberal claim challenged. Section 11A monitoring for general-practice regularisation.
Result: Safari Retreats framework operative. Pre-amendment claim subject to s. 11A regularisation possibility.
Example 4 — Banks 50% option
Facts: Bank's total ITC for month Rs. 10 lakh. Bank exercised sub-s. (4) 50% option.
Analysis: 50% × Rs. 10 lakh = Rs. 5 lakh ITC claimed. Rs. 5 lakh lapses. Operational simplification.
Result: 50% option operates. Lapse is the cost.
Example 5 — CSR expenditure
Facts: Company spent on CSR activities under s. 135 Companies Act. Inputs received with GST.
Analysis: FA 2023 — sub-s. (5)(g) inserted, ITC blocked on CSR-related inputs. Practitioner discipline — track FA 2023 effective date.
Result: CSR ITC blocked post-FA 2023.
Planning and litigation strategy
Litigation defence
Cross-references