J.1 — IGST wrongly paid; held intra-State ( s. 19(1) refund + s. 12 UTGST/DGST no-interest) Facts: Delhi supplier paid IGST Rs. 1.8 lakh on Rs. 10 lakh supply; subsequently held intra-Delhi; correct CGST + DGST Rs. 1.8 lakh payable.…
J
CGST Act · Section J
REFUND + ITC + MIS-CLASSIFICATION CORRECTION
CGST Act, 2017
SECTION J — REFUND + ITC + MIS-CLASSIFICATION CORRECTION
J.1 — IGST wrongly paid; held intra-State (s. 19(1) refund + s. 12 UTGST/DGST no-interest)
Facts: Delhi supplier paid IGST Rs. 1.8 lakh on Rs. 10 lakh supply; subsequently held intra-Delhi; correct CGST + DGST Rs. 1.8 lakh payable.
Computation / Steps:
Step 1. Apply s. 19(1) IGST — refund of IGST Rs. 1.8 lakh.
Step 2. File Form RFD-01 under Rule 89.
Step 3. Relevant date per Circular 162/2021 — date of correct CGST + DGST payment.
Step 4. Pay correct CGST 9% + DGST 9% = Rs. 1.8 lakh.
Step 5. Per s. 19(2) IGST + s. 12 DGST — no interest on CGST + DGST payable.
Step 6. Net cash neutral (subject to refund processing time).
Step 7. ITC chain adjustments at recipient.
Result: Mis-classification correction — refund + no-interest framework. Circular 162/2021 operative.
J.2 — Inverted-duty refund (VKC Footsteps framework)
Facts: Footwear manufacturer pays GST 18% on inputs; sells outputs at 5% (inverted duty); accumulated ITC Rs. 10 lakh.
Computation / Steps:
Step 1. Inverted-duty refund per s. 54(3) CGST + Rule 89(5).
Step 2. Formula: (Net ITC × Inverted-rated turnover) ÷ Adjusted Total Turnover.
Step 3. Refund limited to ITC on inputs (goods) per Rule 89(5) — excludes input services (VKC Footsteps doctrine).
Step 4. File Form RFD-01 under category 'Refund of unutilized ITC on inverted duty structure'.
Step 5. Within 2 years of relevant date.
Result: Inverted-duty refund — input goods ITC only per VKC Footsteps. Critical for inverted-duty sectors.
J.3 — Zero-rated refund of accumulated ITC (export of services)
Facts: Delhi IT exporter has accumulated ITC Rs. 5 lakh; zero-rated export turnover Rs. 50 lakh; total turnover Rs. 60 lakh.
Computation / Steps:
Step 1. Export of services per s. 16(1)(a) IGST under LUT route.
Step 2. Refund under Rule 89(4): Refund = (Zero-rated turnover × Net ITC) ÷ Adjusted Total Turnover.
Step 3. Refund = (50 lakh × 5 lakh) ÷ 60 lakh = Rs. 4.17 lakh.
Step 4. File Form RFD-01 quarterly.
Step 5. 60-day acknowledgement; 90% provisional refund.
Result: Zero-rated services refund per Rule 89(4) formula. Practitioner standard framework.
J.4 — Safari Retreats ITC functionality test (post-judgment)
Facts: Mumbai mall developer constructed mall Rs. 100 cr (CGST + MGST on construction inputs Rs. 18 cr). Mall leased out (taxable rental).
Computation / Steps:
Step 1. Pre-Safari Retreats: s. 17(5)(d) CGST blocks ITC on construction of immovable property other than plant or machinery.
Step 2. Post-Safari Retreats (2024): Functionality test — building used to make taxable outward supplies (rental) may qualify as 'plant' under s. 17(5)(d).
Step 3. Mumbai mall used for taxable rental → may qualify as plant.
Step 4. ITC Rs. 18 cr may be claimable subject to functionality test application.
Step 5. Matter remanded by SC; fact-specific application required.
Step 6. Practitioner reassessment of historical blocked ITC opportunity.
Result: Safari Retreats reset on construction ITC. Functionality test enables ITC for buildings used to make taxable supplies. Major retrospective opportunity.
BLOCK 2 — CONSOLIDATED PRACTITIONER GUIDANCE
Cross-Example Practitioner Themes
CROSS-REFERENCES