STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE — 18-ROW MAP
115C
ITA 1961 · Section 115C
Section 115C — NRI Special Definitions
Chapter XII-A — Special Provisions Relating to Certain Incomes of Non-ResidentsITA 1961Up to AY 2026-27
ITA 1961 · Section 115C
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE — 18-ROW MAP
Function in the statutory architecture
Section 115C defines the terms used in Chapter XII-A, which contains special provisions for certain income of non-resident Indians. A non-resident Indian is an individual, being a citizen of India or a person of Indian origin, who is not resident. A person is of Indian origin if he, or either of his parents or any of his grand-parents, was born in undivided India.
Convertible foreign exchange is foreign exchange treated as convertible by the Reserve Bank of India for the purposes of the Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999. A foreign exchange asset is a specified asset acquired, purchased or subscribed to in convertible foreign exchange. The specified assets are shares in an Indian company, debentures of and deposits with an Indian company that is not a private company, Central Government securities under the Public Debt Act, 1944, and notified assets. Investment income is income derived from a foreign exchange asset. Long-term capital gains are capital gains on a foreign exchange asset that is not a short-term capital asset.
Operative consequences
Status
Section 115C is operative for AY 2026-27. The Finance Act, 2026 does not amend it.
s. 212 defines the same terms for ss. 213 to 218. Its list of specified assets refers to the Government Securities Act, 2006, and it does not repeat clause (a) or the Explanation on persons of Indian origin.
The 1961 Act governs AY 2026-27 and earlier assessment years; the Income-tax Act, 2025 governs tax year 2026-27 onwards. For this subject the 2025 Act provision is s. 212.
Case Laws & Commentary
Section 115C — Definitions
Chapter XII-A: Special Provisions Relating to Certain Incomes of Non-Residents
1. Statutory Snapshot
Section 115C is the definition clause that powers the whole of Chapter XII-A. Every concessional benefit in sections 115D to 115-I is triggered only if the income and the asset answer the descriptions given here. The defined expressions are:
Position under the Income-tax Act, 2025 (w.e.f. 01.04.2026 / AY 2027-28):
The Chapter XII-A definitions are re-enacted, substantially without change of substance, within the 'Special provisions relating to certain incomes of non-residents' of the new Act (the cluster of sections in the range of approx. ss. 212–218, with the s. 115H benefit-continuation rule reproduced at s. 217). Exact numbering should be confirmed against the bare Act, as amended by the Finance Act, 2026.
The substantive tests — convertible foreign exchange source, specified asset and NRI status — carry forward unchanged, so the case law digested below remains good guidance under the new Act.
2. Commentary
2.1 Two cumulative tests: 'source' and 'asset'
An asset qualifies only if both limbs are satisfied — it must be a specified asset (cl. f) AND it must have been acquired/subscribed in convertible foreign exchange (cl. a, via cl. b). An identical share bought out of rupee funds or an NRO balance is not a foreign exchange asset; the same share bought out of NRE/FCNR/inward remittance is. The funding trail is the single most important piece of evidence in any 115C dispute.
2.2 'Investment income' excludes s. 115-O dividends
Because domestic-company dividends were, for long periods, subjected to dividend distribution tax under s. 115-O (and exempt in the shareholder's hands), they were carved out of 'investment income'. After abolition of DDT (Finance Act, 2020), dividends are again taxable in the shareholder's hands; for an NRI they are generally taxed under s. 115A (20%) or the DTAA rate. Do not reflexively push dividends into s. 115E.
2.3 NRI status and 'person of Indian origin'
NRI status borrows the negative of 'resident' from s. 6 and adds the PIO limb. The grand-parent test reaches back to undivided India — a deliberately wide net for the diaspora. Residence is tested year-by-year; an individual may be an NRI in the years of investment and accrual but cease to be one later — exactly the situation s. 115H addresses.
3. Key Issues / Practice Points
4. Case Laws
Direct decision under Chapter XII-A:
Sanjay Gala v. Income Tax Officer
ITA No. 2989/Mum./2008 — decided 15 July 2011 | ITAT 'L' Bench, Mumbai (P.M. Jagtap, AM & V. Durga Rao, JM) | DIRECT decision under Chapter XII-A — the leading s. 115C/115F authority
Facts
Question(s) for determination
Whether bonus shares received in respect of original shares (admittedly acquired in convertible foreign exchange) are themselves a 'foreign exchange asset' within s. 115C(b), so as to be eligible for the s. 115F exemption.
Rival contentions
Decision & reasoning
The Tribunal held that the assessee had acquired the original shares by investing convertible foreign exchange, and the bonus shares cannot be considered in isolation from those original shares.
It noted that the Supreme Court and various High Courts have settled the valuation of bonus shares: the cost of acquisition of the original shares is to be spread over both the original and the bonus shares (the averaging method), because on issue of bonus shares the value of the original shares is proportionately diminished — the holding is, in effect, 'split up'. The cost and value of the original and bonus shares are therefore closely interlinked and interdependent, and once bonus shares are issued the averaging formula applies to the whole holding.
Applying that principle, the bonus shares partake of the character of the original (forex-funded) shares and are covered by s. 115C(b) as a foreign exchange asset; they are accordingly eligible for benefit under s. 115F.
The appeal of the assessee was allowed.
Ratio decidendi
The forex character of an original foreign-currency-funded shareholding flows through to bonus shares issued on it; bonus shares are a 'foreign exchange asset' under s. 115C(b) and qualify for s. 115F.
The cost-averaging principle for bonus shares (the Dalmia Investment line of authority) governs both the characterisation of the bonus shares and the quantification of the qualifying gain.
Application to this section
This is the foundational authority on what is a 'foreign exchange asset' under s. 115C(b). It establishes that the statutory words 'acquired or purchased with, or subscribed to in, convertible foreign exchange' are read to include accretions (bonus shares) that derive from a forex-funded original holding.
Practice note: The leading authority to defend Chapter XII-A claims on accreted/derivative securities. Retain the original FIRC / contract notes to anchor the forex 'flow-through'.
Allied / foundational authorities relied upon (verify before citing):
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Dalmia Investment Co. Ltd.
[1964] 52 ITR 567 | Supreme Court of India | FOUNDATIONAL — cost of bonus shares (relied on in Sanjay Gala)
Facts
Question(s) for determination
What is the correct method of determining the cost of acquisition of bonus shares?
Decision & reasoning
The Supreme Court examined the competing methods — taking the cost of bonus shares as nil, at face value, at market price on the date of issue, or by spreading the original cost — and held that, where the bonus shares rank pari passu with the original shares, the correct method is to spread the cost of the original shares over the whole holding (original + bonus) and take the average.
The Court reasoned that the issue of bonus shares depresses the market value of the original shares, so the cost must be re-distributed over the enlarged holding to reflect economic reality.
Ratio decidendi
Cost of bonus shares is to be computed by averaging the original cost over original and bonus shares; the two are interdependent.
Application to this section
Supplies the cost-averaging logic expressly applied in Sanjay Gala to characterise bonus shares as forex assets under s. 115C(b).
Practice note: This is the precise principle the Mumbai Tribunal applied in Sanjay Gala to characterise bonus shares as a foreign exchange asset and to quantify the s. 115F-eligible gain.
Miss Dhun Dadabhoy Kapadia v. Commissioner of Income Tax
[1967] 63 ITR 651 | Supreme Court of India | ALLIED — interdependence of original holding and accretions
Facts
Question(s) for determination
Whether, in computing capital gains on the sale of a rights entitlement, the diminution in the value of the original shares (attributable to the rights issue) is to be taken into account.
Decision & reasoning
The Supreme Court held that the value of the right must be measured against the depreciation in the market value of the original shares brought about by the rights issue; the original holding and the accretion are interlinked and the real gain must reflect that diminution.
Ratio decidendi
Accretions (rights/bonus) and the original holding are economically interdependent and must be valued together — the accretion is not a stand-alone, cost-free asset.
Application to this section
Reinforces that an accretion (rights/bonus) is not a stand-alone, cost-free asset but is interlinked with the original forex-funded holding — supporting the 115C(b) characterisation.
Practice note: Reinforces the 'interdependence / flow-through' reasoning applied to bonus shares in the Chapter XII-A context (Sanjay Gala).
5. Cross-references
s. 6 (residence) • s. 2(2) Public Debt Act, 1944 • FEMA, 1999 / RBI convertibility • s. 115D (computation) • s. 115E (rates) • s. 115F (exemption) • s. 115A (NRI dividend/interest outside the Chapter).
Standing Disclaimer & Verification Note