BharatTax.co — Knowledge Portal
271AAC

ITA 1961 · Section 271AAC

Section 271AAC — Penalty in Respect of Certain Income (Sections 68 to 69D)

Chapter XXI — Penalties ImposableITA 1961Up to AY 2025-26

CHAPTER XXI — PENALTIES IMPOSABLE

CHAPTER XXI — PENALTIES IMPOSABLE

Section 271AAC — Penalty in Respect of Certain Income (Sections 68 to 69D)

Case Laws & Commentary — Income-tax Act, 1961 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026) — bharattax.co Treatise

Status: Live. Where the assessed income includes income of the nature referred to in sections 68, 69, 69A, 69B, 69C or 69D and is taxed under section 115BBE, a penalty of 10% of the tax payable under section 115BBE is leviable — in addition to that tax — unless the income was included in the return and the 115BBE tax was paid. The section 270A penalty does not apply to such income (to avoid double penalty).

Finance Act, 2026: No amendment by the Finance Act, 2026.

Mechanism: Assessed income includes unexplained cash credits/investments/expenditure etc. taxed under section 115BBE → penalty of 10% of the 115BBE tax → but no penalty where the assessee had included that income in the section 139 return and paid the 115BBE tax by year-end; section 270A is excluded for the same income.

Litigation profile: Litigated on (i) the "return-inclusion" exemption in the proviso; (ii) whether the penalty can stand where the 115BBE tax itself is nil or the addition is on estimate; and (iii) the requirement to specify the charge.

A. COMMENTARY

A companion to section 115BBE

Section 271AAC is the penalty arm of the section 115BBE special-rate regime for unexplained credits and investments. Where income of the section 68 to 69D variety is assessed and charged at the punitive 115BBE rate, section 271AAC adds a 10% penalty on that tax. Crucially, section 270A is switched off for the same income, so the assessee faces 271AAC, not 270A, on the unexplained items.

The return-inclusion exemption

The proviso to sub-section (1) is the principal shelter: no penalty if the assessee had included the section 68 to 69D income in the return furnished under section 139 and paid the section 115BBE tax on or before the end of the relevant previous year. A voluntary, returned and tax-paid disclosure is therefore penalty-free.

Nil 115BBE tax and estimate additions

Because the penalty is computed as a percentage of the section 115BBE tax, the Tribunal has held that where that tax is nil the penalty cannot survive; and where an addition is purely on estimate without establishing the income as one falling under sections 68 to 69D, the foundational condition for section 271AAC is not met.

B. STATUTORY TEXT (verbatim)

Reproduced from the Income-tax Act, 1961 as amended up to the Finance Act, 2025; Finance Act, 2026 changes are noted above.

Penalty in respect of certain income.

271AAC. (1) The Assessing Officer or the Joint Commissioner (Appeals) or the Commissioner

(Appeals) may, notwithstanding anything contained in this Act other than the provisions of section 271AAB,

direct that, in a case where the income determined includes any income referred to in section 68, section 69,

section 69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D for any previous year, the assessee shall pay by way

of penalty, in addition to tax payable under section 115BBE, a sum computed at the rate of ten per cent of

the tax payable under clause (i) of sub-section (1) of section 115BBE:

Provided that no penalty shall be levied in respect of income referred to in section 68, section 69, section

69A, section 69B, section 69C or section 69D to the extent such income has been included by the assessee

in the return of income furnished under section 139 and the tax in accordance with the provisions of clause

(i) of sub-section (1) of section 115BBE has been paid on or before the end of the relevant previous year.

(2) No penalty under the provisions of section 270A shall be imposed upon the assessee in respect of the

income referred to in sub-section (1).

(3) The provisions of sections 274 and 275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to

in this section.

C. AUTHORITIES

Authority is largely at the Tribunal level and turns on the statutory conditions — the return-inclusion proviso, the section 115BBE linkage, and the correct characterisation of the income. The candour rule is observed; named decisions are cited where available.

1. The return-inclusion exemption and nil-115BBE cases

Principle — income disclosed in the section 139 return and 115BBE tax paid

Proposition Where the section 68 to 69D income was included in the section 139 return and the section 115BBE tax was paid by the end of the relevant previous year, the proviso to section 271AAC(1) bars the penalty.

Use The complete defence for a voluntary, returned and tax-paid disclosure.

Principle — penalty fails where 115BBE tax is nil (ITAT Hyderabad)

Proposition Since the penalty is 10% of the tax payable under section 115BBE, where that tax is nil the penalty cannot be sustained; the matter is, at most, remitted for verification.

Use Quantum defence deleting the penalty where no 115BBE tax is in fact payable.

Principle — surrendered income declared in the (revised) return

Proposition Where the surrendered income was declared in a revised return accepted as a return under section 139, and section 115BBE tax paid, the Tribunal has held there is no reason to sustain the 271AAC penalty.

Use Extends the return-inclusion shelter to accepted revised returns.

2. The income must answer sections 68 to 69D; correct section to be invoked

Principle — foundational characterisation

Proposition Section 271AAC applies only where the assessed income includes income "referred to in" sections 68 to 69D and is charged under section 115BBE; a generic estimate addition not so characterised does not attract it.

Use Resists a 271AAC penalty riding on an ordinary estimate addition.

Principle — wrong section (271AAB) rectifiable to 271AAC under section 154

Proposition Where the assessment wrongly referenced section 271AAB but section 271AAC plainly applied on the facts, the error is a mistake apparent from the record rectifiable under section 154 — not a change of satisfaction (ITAT).

Use Shows the charge must match the facts; but a clerical mis-citation may be corrected.

Principle — section 270A excluded; no double penalty

Proposition The same unexplained income cannot be penalised under both section 270A and section 271AAC; section 270A(6)(e) and the scheme of section 271AAC ensure it is dealt with once.

Use Bars a parallel section 270A penalty on the same items.

Prepared for the bharattax.co Treatise on the Income-tax Act, 1961 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026). Statutory text reproduced from the official Act; case-law holdings are the author’s summaries for professional use.