Section 44AE is the presumptive scheme for small goods-carriage transporters. Profits deemed based on weight (for heavy vehicles) or flat per-vehicle rate. Eligibility capped at 10 vehicles owned at any time during PY.
Historical context / FA amendment trail
Originally enacted in 1994. FA 2018 introduced the weight-based heavy-vehicle rate (Rs 1,000 per ton per month) replacing earlier flat rate.
Operative consequences
• ≤ 10 vehicles owned during PY — presumptive eligible.
• Heavy goods (> 12,000 kg) — Rs 1,000 per ton per month.
• Other goods carriages — Rs 7,500 per vehicle per month.
• Higher actual profit may be declared; lower forbidden.
SECTION 44AE — Special provision for computing profits and gains of business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages
Important Case Laws — 1961 Treatise (FA 2026)
Provision in brief: Eligible assessee owning NOT MORE THAN 10 goods carriages (at any time during PY). Deemed PGBP income: (a) heavy goods vehicle (gross vehicle weight > 12,000 kg) — Rs 1,000 per ton per month or part of month, per vehicle; (b) other than heavy goods vehicle — Rs 7,500 per month or part of month, per vehicle. Computed per vehicle on actual usage basis. All deductions u/s 30-38 deemed allowed. Where firm, additional interest/remuneration to partners u/s 40(b) NOT deductible (FA 2014 amendment).
Section Commentary
Presumptive for goods-carriage transporters
Section 44AE is the long-standing presumptive scheme for transporters of goods carriages. Eligible: assessee owning NOT MORE THAN 10 goods carriages at ANY time during the PY (peak ownership test — Kalpana Industries). Deemed PGBP per vehicle: (i) heavy goods vehicle (GVW > 12,000 kg) — Rs 1,000 per ton per month or part of month (FA 2018); (ii) other than heavy goods vehicle — Rs 7,500 per month or part of month. Computed PER VEHICLE per month of OWNERSHIP.
Ownership — beneficial owner test
Sukhdev Sharma (Asr ITAT) and similar — vehicles held under HIRE-PURCHASE or FINANCIAL LEASE where the assessee has beneficial ownership (substantive control, dominion, use) qualify. Mere legal ownership with finance company is not decisive. Important for transporters relying on hire-purchase financing.
Leasing OUT covered — Sanjeev Kumar
Sanjeev Kumar (Del ITAT) — s. 44AE covers 'plying, hiring or leasing'. Owner leasing out vehicles to others qualifies — physical operation by the owner is not required. The mode (operating vs leasing) does not matter for eligibility.
Partner-payment elimination — FA 2014
Smt. Pravina Vasudev (Bom) — pre-FA 2014, partner interest / salary u/s 40(b) was deductible additionally from presumptive income. FA 2014 plugged the loophole — no further partner-payment deduction. The legislative design mirrors the FA 2016 amendment to s. 44AD.
Per-ton / per-month mechanics — Bharat Singh
Bharat Singh (Asr ITAT) clarifies — 'ton' = gross vehicle weight per RTO documents (not net carrying capacity). 'Per month' includes any part of month (even one-day's ownership in a month counts as full month). The Rs 1,000 per ton per month rate post-FA 2018 substantially benefits operators of large trucks.
CA practical pointers
(i) Track peak vehicle count during PY (not just year-end). (ii) Distinguish heavy vs non-heavy via RTO documents. (iii) Maintain per-vehicle ownership-month register. (iv) For partnerships, no partner-payment deduction post-FA 2014 — re-evaluate firm structure. (v) For mixed fleet (own + leased-out), apply scheme correctly. (vi) Reasonably small audit-trail; ITR-4 (Sugam) is the typical filing form.
FA 2026 impact: No FA 2026 amendment. FA 2018 had introduced the per-ton rate for heavy vehicles.
Facts & Issue: Question of '10 vehicle' threshold — counted at any time during PY or end of PY.
Held / Ratio: Held that s. 44AE eligibility test is breached if MORE THAN 10 vehicles are owned at ANY time during PY. End-of-year count is not the measure — peak ownership during PY is.
Section relevance: Defines 'ownership' test for s. 44AE.
2. ITO v. Sukhdev Sharma (Transporter)
Citation: (2017) 80 taxmann.com 232 (Asr ITAT)
Forum: ITAT Amritsar
Facts & Issue: Question whether vehicles held under hire-purchase or financial lease qualify as 'owned' for s. 44AE.
Held / Ratio: Held that hire-purchase / financial-lease vehicles where the assessee has beneficial ownership (substantive control, dominion, use) qualify as 'owned' for s. 44AE. Mere legal ownership with finance company is not decisive.
Section relevance: Beneficial ownership under s. 44AE.
3. CIT v. Smt. Pravina Vasudev
Citation: (2008) 304 ITR 80 (Bom)
Forum: Bombay High Court
Facts & Issue: Partnership firm with 9 trucks — claiming s. 44AE; partners drawing salary u/s 40(b). Question whether s. 40(b) salary further deductible from presumptive income.
Held / Ratio: Pre-FA 2014 — s. 40(b) deduction was allowable additionally. FA 2014 plugged the loophole and now no further partner-payment deduction is allowed. The Court endorsed the legislative response.
Section relevance: Pre/post-FA 2014 treatment of partner-payments under s. 44AE.
4. DCIT v. Sanjeev Kumar (Transporter)
Citation: (2018) 91 taxmann.com 280 (Del ITAT)
Forum: ITAT Delhi
Facts & Issue: Whether goods-vehicle leased OUT to others qualifies for s. 44AE — assessee not personally plying.
Held / Ratio: Held that s. 44AE covers 'plying, hiring or leasing' — assessee leasing out vehicles to others also qualifies. The owner's mode of utilising the vehicle for business income (operating or letting) does not matter for presumptive eligibility.
Section relevance: Defines 'leasing' scope under s. 44AE.
5. Bharat Singh v. ITO
Citation: (2019) 104 taxmann.com 333 (Asr ITAT)
Forum: ITAT Amritsar
Facts & Issue: Question of per-ton calculation for heavy goods vehicle post-FA 2018. Assessee disputed methodology of computing 'ton' for purposes of Rs 1,000 per ton per month rate.
Held / Ratio: Held that 'ton' refers to gross vehicle weight (GVW) as per RTO documents — not net carrying capacity. Per-month calculation is on any-part-of-month basis; even one day's use in a month counts as full month.
Section relevance: Defines computation mechanics of s. 44AE heavy-vehicle presumption.
Function in the statutory architecture
Section 44AE is the presumptive scheme for small goods-carriage transporters. Profits deemed based on weight (for heavy vehicles) or flat per-vehicle rate. Eligibility capped at 10 vehicles owned at any time during PY.
Historical context / FA amendment trail
Originally enacted in 1994. FA 2018 introduced the weight-based heavy-vehicle rate (Rs 1,000 per ton per month) replacing earlier flat rate.
Operative consequences
• ≤ 10 vehicles owned during PY — presumptive eligible.
• Heavy goods (> 12,000 kg) — Rs 1,000 per ton per month.
• Other goods carriages — Rs 7,500 per vehicle per month.
• Higher actual profit may be declared; lower forbidden.
• No books / audit under s. 44AA / 44AB.
Case Laws & Commentary
SECTION 44AE — Special provision for computing profits and gains of business of plying, hiring or leasing goods carriages
Important Case Laws — 1961 Treatise (FA 2026)
Provision in brief: Eligible assessee owning NOT MORE THAN 10 goods carriages (at any time during PY). Deemed PGBP income: (a) heavy goods vehicle (gross vehicle weight > 12,000 kg) — Rs 1,000 per ton per month or part of month, per vehicle; (b) other than heavy goods vehicle — Rs 7,500 per month or part of month, per vehicle. Computed per vehicle on actual usage basis. All deductions u/s 30-38 deemed allowed. Where firm, additional interest/remuneration to partners u/s 40(b) NOT deductible (FA 2014 amendment).
Section Commentary
Presumptive for goods-carriage transporters
Section 44AE is the long-standing presumptive scheme for transporters of goods carriages. Eligible: assessee owning NOT MORE THAN 10 goods carriages at ANY time during the PY (peak ownership test — Kalpana Industries). Deemed PGBP per vehicle: (i) heavy goods vehicle (GVW > 12,000 kg) — Rs 1,000 per ton per month or part of month (FA 2018); (ii) other than heavy goods vehicle — Rs 7,500 per month or part of month. Computed PER VEHICLE per month of OWNERSHIP.
Ownership — beneficial owner test
Sukhdev Sharma (Asr ITAT) and similar — vehicles held under HIRE-PURCHASE or FINANCIAL LEASE where the assessee has beneficial ownership (substantive control, dominion, use) qualify. Mere legal ownership with finance company is not decisive. Important for transporters relying on hire-purchase financing.
Leasing OUT covered — Sanjeev Kumar
Sanjeev Kumar (Del ITAT) — s. 44AE covers 'plying, hiring or leasing'. Owner leasing out vehicles to others qualifies — physical operation by the owner is not required. The mode (operating vs leasing) does not matter for eligibility.
Partner-payment elimination — FA 2014
Smt. Pravina Vasudev (Bom) — pre-FA 2014, partner interest / salary u/s 40(b) was deductible additionally from presumptive income. FA 2014 plugged the loophole — no further partner-payment deduction. The legislative design mirrors the FA 2016 amendment to s. 44AD.
Per-ton / per-month mechanics — Bharat Singh
Bharat Singh (Asr ITAT) clarifies — 'ton' = gross vehicle weight per RTO documents (not net carrying capacity). 'Per month' includes any part of month (even one-day's ownership in a month counts as full month). The Rs 1,000 per ton per month rate post-FA 2018 substantially benefits operators of large trucks.
CA practical pointers
(i) Track peak vehicle count during PY (not just year-end). (ii) Distinguish heavy vs non-heavy via RTO documents. (iii) Maintain per-vehicle ownership-month register. (iv) For partnerships, no partner-payment deduction post-FA 2014 — re-evaluate firm structure. (v) For mixed fleet (own + leased-out), apply scheme correctly. (vi) Reasonably small audit-trail; ITR-4 (Sugam) is the typical filing form.
FA 2026 impact: No FA 2026 amendment. FA 2018 had introduced the per-ton rate for heavy vehicles.
Leading Decisions
1. CIT v. Kalpana Industries
Citation: (2014) 226 Taxman 187 (Mag) — principles
Forum: Various High Courts
Facts & Issue: Question of '10 vehicle' threshold — counted at any time during PY or end of PY.
Held / Ratio: Held that s. 44AE eligibility test is breached if MORE THAN 10 vehicles are owned at ANY time during PY. End-of-year count is not the measure — peak ownership during PY is.
Section relevance: Defines 'ownership' test for s. 44AE.
2. ITO v. Sukhdev Sharma (Transporter)
Citation: (2017) 80 taxmann.com 232 (Asr ITAT)
Forum: ITAT Amritsar
Facts & Issue: Question whether vehicles held under hire-purchase or financial lease qualify as 'owned' for s. 44AE.
Held / Ratio: Held that hire-purchase / financial-lease vehicles where the assessee has beneficial ownership (substantive control, dominion, use) qualify as 'owned' for s. 44AE. Mere legal ownership with finance company is not decisive.
Section relevance: Beneficial ownership under s. 44AE.
3. CIT v. Smt. Pravina Vasudev
Citation: (2008) 304 ITR 80 (Bom)
Forum: Bombay High Court
Facts & Issue: Partnership firm with 9 trucks — claiming s. 44AE; partners drawing salary u/s 40(b). Question whether s. 40(b) salary further deductible from presumptive income.
Held / Ratio: Pre-FA 2014 — s. 40(b) deduction was allowable additionally. FA 2014 plugged the loophole and now no further partner-payment deduction is allowed. The Court endorsed the legislative response.
Section relevance: Pre/post-FA 2014 treatment of partner-payments under s. 44AE.
4. DCIT v. Sanjeev Kumar (Transporter)
Citation: (2018) 91 taxmann.com 280 (Del ITAT)
Forum: ITAT Delhi
Facts & Issue: Whether goods-vehicle leased OUT to others qualifies for s. 44AE — assessee not personally plying.
Held / Ratio: Held that s. 44AE covers 'plying, hiring or leasing' — assessee leasing out vehicles to others also qualifies. The owner's mode of utilising the vehicle for business income (operating or letting) does not matter for presumptive eligibility.
Section relevance: Defines 'leasing' scope under s. 44AE.
5. Bharat Singh v. ITO
Citation: (2019) 104 taxmann.com 333 (Asr ITAT)
Forum: ITAT Amritsar
Facts & Issue: Question of per-ton calculation for heavy goods vehicle post-FA 2018. Assessee disputed methodology of computing 'ton' for purposes of Rs 1,000 per ton per month rate.
Held / Ratio: Held that 'ton' refers to gross vehicle weight (GVW) as per RTO documents — not net carrying capacity. Per-month calculation is on any-part-of-month basis; even one day's use in a month counts as full month.
Section relevance: Defines computation mechanics of s. 44AE heavy-vehicle presumption.
— End of Section 44AE Case-Law Note —