Section 253 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 133 A -- the SURVEY POWER which is the NON-COERCIVE counterpart of search-and-seizure ( s. 247 ). Income-tax authority may enter business / professional premises during business hours,…
253
Section 253 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 133 A -- the SURVEY POWER which is the NON-COERCIVE counterpart of search-and-seizure ( s. 247 ). Income-tax authority may enter business / professional premises during business hours,…
Section 253 — - POWERS OF SURVEY
Section 253 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 133A -- the SURVEY POWER which is the NON-COERCIVE counterpart of search-and-seizure (s. 247). Income-tax authority may enter business / professional premises during business hours, inspect books / documents / cash / stock, record statements, and gather information -- BUT WITHOUT seizure power. Used primarily for INVESTIGATION OF UNDISCLOSED INCOME without escalating to search. Two types: (a) general survey at any business / professional premises; (b) survey at function / event for inspecting cash / arrangements. Recent significant amendment (FA 2020 + FA 2022): post FA 2022, statements recorded during survey are NOT admissible as direct evidence (post Khader Khan Son SC line of cases) unless corroborated.
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE
ELIGIBLE OFFICERS: AO / Joint CIT / Joint Director / etc. (no Pr CIT-level authorisation required, unlike search). ENTRY CONDITIONS: (a) PREMISES: business / professional premises only; NOT residence (cannot enter residence under survey -- only search under s. 247); (b) TIME: during BUSINESS HOURS (general business / professional times); (c) PURPOSE: inspect books / documents / cash / stock / valuables; collect information for assessment / verification. POWERS UNDER SURVEY (sub-s. 1): (a) Enter and inspect; (b) Examine / count cash / stock / valuables; (c) Inspect books / documents; (d) Record STATEMENTS of any person present (subject to FA 2020/2022 admissibility limitations); (e) IMPOUND books / documents (with reasons) -- max 15 days, extendable with PCIT approval; NO general seizure power; (f) Take note / extract from books / documents. FA 2022 statement-evidence amendment: statements recorded during survey under sub-s. (1) NOT to be used as evidence in proceedings unless corroborated. Codifies CIT v. Khader Khan Son SC ratio.
CASE LAW
(i) CIT v. Khader Khan Son (SC, 2008, 300 ITR 157) -- statements during survey not directly admissible as evidence; corroboration required. (ii) CIT v. S. Khader Khan Son (Mad HC, 2011) -- post-survey retraction of statement permitted with reasonable cause. (iii) Paul Mathews & Sons v. CIT (Ker HC) -- distinction between survey and search; survey limited scope. (iv) PCIT v. Best Infrastructure (Del HC) -- survey extended hours / impound period; PCIT approval required. (v) ITAT decisions on stock-taking discrepancies vs book records during survey.
PLANNING NOTES
(i) STATEMENT RECORDING -- reserve right to revise; do not make voluntary disclosure under pressure. (ii) STOCK / CASH RECONCILIATION -- have inventory / cash records ready; explanation of any discrepancy in book vs physical. (iii) IMPOUNDING TRACKING -- 15-day default extension; demand return after extension expires; PCIT approval required for further hold. (iv) PROFESSIONAL CONFIDENTIALITY -- attorney-client / CA-client privileged communications protected; not subject to inspection. (v) WRIT JURISDICTION -- procedural-violation writ if survey-out-of-business-hours / officer-without-authority etc.
CROSS-REFERENCES