BLOCK 1 — VERBATIM TEXT Marginal note — Value of taxable supply 15. (1) Value of supply = transaction value, i.e., price actually paid or payable, where supplier and recipient are not related AND price is the sole consideration. (2) Value…
15
BLOCK 1 — VERBATIM TEXT Marginal note — Value of taxable supply 15. (1) Value of supply = transaction value, i.e., price actually paid or payable, where supplier and recipient are not related AND price is the sole consideration. (2) Value…
Section 15 — VALUE OF TAXABLE SUPPLY
BLOCK 1 — VERBATIM TEXT
Marginal note — Value of taxable supply
15. (1) Value of supply = transaction value, i.e., price actually paid or payable, where supplier and recipient are not related AND price is the sole consideration.
(2) Value SHALL INCLUDE — (a) non-GST taxes / duties / cesses / fees charged separately; (b) amount supplier liable to pay but incurred by recipient; (c) incidental expenses (commission, packing, pre-delivery charges); (d) interest / late fee / penalty for delayed payment; (e) subsidies directly linked to price (excluding Government subsidies). Explanation — subsidy included in value of supplier-recipient.
(3) Value SHALL NOT INCLUDE discount where — (a) given before / at time of supply AND duly recorded in invoice; OR (b) post-supply discount where (i) established in agreement at or before time of supply AND specifically linked to relevant invoices; (ii) recipient has reversed proportionate ITC.
(4) Where value not determinable under sub-s. (1) — determined as prescribed (Rules 27-31).
(5) Notwithstanding sub-s. (1)/(4), notified supplies — determined as prescribed (Rule 31A, 31B, 31C, 32, 32A).
Explanation — ‘related persons’ include — directors / officers of each other; partners; employer-employee; 25% voting power / shares ownership; one controls the other or both controlled by third party; control a third party together; same family members. ‘Person’ includes legal persons. Sole agent / distributor / concessionaire deemed related.
[Section 15 enforced 01.07.2017.]
BLOCK 2 — VALUATION RULES UNDER CGST RULES 27-35
RULE
WHEN IT APPLIES
Rule 27
Consideration not wholly in money — open market value (OMV), then comparable, then cost-plus 10%, then residual
Rule 28
Supply between distinct or related persons (other than agent) — OMV / comparable / 90% of price to unrelated recipient (where goods for further supply) / Rule 30 / Rule 31. SECOND PROVISO post Notif. 26/2018-CT — if recipient eligible for full ITC, any invoice value acceptable
Rule 29
Supply through agent — OMV or 90% of price to unrelated buyer
Rule 30
Residual — cost-plus 10%
Rule 31
Reasonable means consistent with s. 15 / rules
Rule 31A
Lottery / betting / gambling / horse racing
Rule 31B
Online money gaming (from 01.10.2023)
Rule 31C
Casinos (from 01.10.2023)
Rule 32
Special cases — money changers; air travel agents; life insurance; second-hand goods (margin scheme); voucher; notified services between distinct persons
Rule 32A
Kerala Flood Cess (historical)
Rule 33
Pure agent — amount excluded from value
Rule 34
Foreign currency conversion rate
Rule 35
Value inclusive of tax — back-calculation
BLOCK 3 — COMMENTARY
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE — TRANSACTION VALUE AS DEFAULT
Section 15(1) lays the default rule: value = transaction value, subject to two conditions — (i) supplier and recipient not related; (ii) price is the sole consideration. Architecture drawn from Article VII GATT 1994 valuation principles, transposed earlier into Customs Valuation Rules. Where either condition fails — Rule 27-31 mechanics. Sub-s. (5) permits notified-supply special valuation (lottery, gaming, casinos, money exchange, second-hand goods, life insurance).
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE — STATUTORY INCLUSIONS AND EXCLUSIONS
Sub-s. (2) inclusions — five-fold: (a) non-GST taxes; (b) recipient-paid liabilities of supplier; (c) incidental expenses; (d) interest / late fee / penalty for delayed payment; (e) price-linked subsidies (excluding Government subsidies). Sub-s. (3) exclusion — discounts: pre-supply (auto-excluded if on invoice); post-supply (three conditions — pre-existing agreement, invoice-linked, recipient ITC reversal). The post-supply discount conditions are STRICT and a major source of litigation.
JUDICIAL EVOLUTION — Below-cost / non-arm's-length valuation
Commissioner of Central Excise v. Fiat India (P) Ltd. — (2012) 9 SCC 332; (2012) 283 ELT 161 (SC) [Three-Judge Bench, Supreme Court]
Brief Facts: Fiat India sold cars (Uno, Premier 118NE) at prices below cost of production over an extended period (5 years) for market penetration. Central Excise Department demanded duty on the normal price (cost + reasonable margin), arguing that the below-cost sale was not the genuine transaction value because the price was not the sole consideration — the extra-commercial benefit of market penetration was a non-monetary consideration.
Issue: Whether transaction value under s. 4 Central Excise Act (analogous to s. 15 CGST) is the sole basis where the price is below cost over an extended period for extra-commercial purpose.
HELD: Below-cost sale over extended period for market penetration is NOT a normal commercial transaction. The price is not the sole consideration — there is a non-monetary consideration (market position / penetration). Transaction value rejected; valuation rules apply (cost-plus method).
"When the price is not the sole consideration for the sale, recourse must be had to the valuation rules. The extra commercial consideration of market penetration is sufficient to take the transaction outside the realm of section 4(1)(a) and into the rule-based valuation regime."
Relevance: Fiat India principle applies under GST via Rule 30 (cost-plus). Practitioners advising in industries with introductory pricing / market-penetration strategy / loss-leader sales should: (i) document the SHORT-TERM nature of below-cost pricing (extended periods invite Fiat India challenge); (ii) preserve commercial rationale; (iii) avoid related-party below-cost where Rule 28 OMV is determinable; (iv) for distress sales (genuine commercial necessity), document the distress context.
INTERPRETATIVE POSITION — Post-supply discount conditions
The Department's consistent administrative position, reinforced by CBIC Circular 92/11/2019-GST dated 07.03.2019 and the plain text of s. 15(3)(b), is that the three conditions for excluding a post-supply discount from taxable value are CONJUNCTIVE — (i) the discount must be established in an agreement entered into at or before the time of supply; (ii) the discount must be specifically linked to the relevant invoices; (iii) input tax credit attributable to the discount must be reversed by the recipient. Failure of any one condition — the discount is NOT excluded from taxable value; the credit note becomes a mere commercial document with no GST consequence.
Crucial planning point. Practitioners advising on volume rebate / annual incentive / promotional discount schemes should: (i) draft a contemporaneous agreement BEFORE the supply; (ii) specify the invoice-linkage mechanism (FIFO / pro-rata); (iii) obtain CA-certificate or written confirmation from the recipient on ITC reversal. Without all three, no GST relief — the supplier must absorb the discount from margin.
STATUTORY POSITION — Related-party valuation under Rule 28
Distinct persons (same PAN, different State registrations) and related parties — supplies between them are taxable under Schedule I Entry 2 even without consideration. Rule 28 of the CGST Rules, 2017 prescribes the valuation hierarchy: (i) OMV; (ii) value of like-kind-and-quality; (iii) 90% of price to unrelated recipient (where goods are for further supply); (iv) Rule 30 cost-plus 10%; (v) Rule 31 residual. The SECOND PROVISO to Rule 28 — where the recipient is eligible for FULL ITC, the value declared in the invoice is deemed the OMV — eliminates the burden of OMV calculation for fully-creditable supplies. Practitioners should leverage the second proviso for fully-ITC-eligible recipients (most B2B intra-group transactions); only where the recipient's ITC is restricted (e.g., exempt-supply operations) does the Department's valuation challenge bite. CBIC Circular 199/11/2023-GST clarified that not every internally-generated service requires a cross-charge.
INTERPRETATIVE POSITION — Liquidated damages and value
CBIC Circular 178/10/2022-GST dated 03.08.2022 is the principal authority on the GST treatment of liquidated damages. The position is: LD is compensation for breach, not consideration for any agreed-to-be-rendered service — it is NOT a separate supply under s. 7. Whether LD falls within s. 15(2)(d) — interest / late fee / penalty for delayed payment of consideration — depends on facts. Where LD is structured as a penalty for breach (not as a delayed-payment penalty), it is OUTSIDE both supply and s. 15(2)(d). Distinguish carefully: (i) LD for breach — no supply, not in value; (ii) interest on overdue invoices — within s. 15(2)(d), included in value with time of supply at receipt. Document the structure carefully in the underlying contract.
CIRCULARS AND NOTIFICATIONS
• Notification 26/2018-CT dated 13.06.2018 — Second proviso to Rule 28 inserted. Critical practical relief — for distinct-person supplies where recipient eligible for full ITC, invoice value is deemed OMV.
• Circular 92/11/2019-GST dated 07.03.2019 — Sales promotion schemes — discounts; gifts; free samples; buy-one-get-one. Comprehensive treatment of promotional schemes; clarified treatment of secondary discounts.
• Circular 105/24/2019-GST dated 28.06.2019 [withdrawn] — Post-sale discount clarifications [originally issued; later withdrawn vide Circular 112/31/2019-GST due to industry pushback]. Historical reference only; withdrawn position.
• Circular 112/31/2019-GST dated 03.10.2019 — Withdrawal of Circular 105 / fresh clarification. Operative position on post-sale discounts and corresponding ITC.
• Circular 178/10/2022-GST dated 03.08.2022 — Liquidated damages, notice pay, cancellation. Key clarification — generally not supply / not in value; distinguish from interest on overdue.
• Circular 199/11/2023-GST dated 17.07.2023 — Distinct persons (HO-BO) — Rule 28 application. Cost recovery not always required; Rule 28 second proviso applies broadly.
• Circular 211/5/2024-GST dated 26.06.2024 — RCM self-invoicing and valuation. Operational clarifications on RCM value and self-invoice.
PROCEDURE — VALUATION ANALYSIS
Step 1: Identify supplier-recipient relationship
Related / unrelated (per Explanation to s. 15); distinct persons (s. 25(4)/(5)).
Step 2: Determine sole-consideration status
Monetary price the sole consideration? Any non-monetary inducement / barter / extra-commercial benefit?
Step 3: If both conditions met → transaction value
Verify inclusions under sub-s. (2) and exclusions under sub-s. (3).
Step 4: If conditions not met → Rule 27-31
For non-money consideration → Rule 27. For related / distinct persons → Rule 28 (verify second proviso applicability). For agent supplies → Rule 29. Cost-plus → Rule 30. Residual → Rule 31.
Step 5: For notified supplies — apply special rule
Rule 31A (gambling); 31B (online gaming); 31C (casinos); 32 (special cases); 33 (pure agent).
Step 6: Apply discount exclusion under sub-s. (3)
Pre-supply auto-excluded on invoice; post-supply three-condition test.
Step 7: Document the valuation analysis
File note with CA-certificate / commercial documentation; preserve for audit.
CHECKLIST — VALUATION COMPLIANCE
Pre-transaction valuation checklist
□ Supplier-recipient relationship identified (related / distinct / unrelated)
□ Sole-consideration status verified (no barter / non-monetary / extra-commercial)
□ Transaction value or Rule-based valuation determined per s. 15(1) or 15(4)/(5)
□ Sub-s. (2) statutory inclusions checked (non-GST taxes, recipient-paid liabilities, incidental expenses, interest / late fee, price-linked non-Government subsidies)
□ Sub-s. (3) discount conditions verified for any claimed discounts
□ For related-party — Rule 28 hierarchy applied; second proviso checked for full-ITC recipient
□ For pure-agent reimbursements — Rule 33 conditions documented
□ For foreign-currency transactions — Rule 34 exchange rate captured
□ Tax-inclusive vs tax-exclusive computation correct (Rule 35 back-calculation if inclusive)
□ Documentation preserved (cost sheets for Fiat India defence; pre-supply agreements for discounts; CA certificates)
WORKED EXAMPLES
Example 15.1 — Related-party valuation (Rule 28 second proviso)
HO-to-BO transfer of management services
Facts: M/s ParentCo (HO Mumbai) provides centralised management services to its branch M/s BranchCo (Bangalore). Both are distinct persons (same PAN). BranchCo is engaged in fully taxable supplies — eligible for full ITC. ParentCo internally allocates Rs. 50 lakh as the value of management services per year.
Step 1: Verify distinct-person relationship (s. 25(4) — same PAN, different States).
Step 2: Schedule I Entry 2 applies — supply between distinct persons taxable even without consideration.
Step 3: Valuation under Rule 28.
Step 4: Rule 28 hierarchy: OMV first. However — SECOND PROVISO to Rule 28 (Notif. 26/2018-CT): if recipient eligible for full ITC, invoice value accepted.
Step 5: BranchCo eligible for full ITC → ParentCo's invoice value (Rs. 50 lakh) accepted.
Result: Rs. 50 lakh deemed OMV. GST at applicable rate (18% on management services) = Rs. 9 lakh. BranchCo claims full ITC. No revenue impact at group level. Practitioners should document the full-ITC eligibility of recipient; if recipient has any exempt-supply (e.g., interest income for an NBFC arm), the second proviso may not apply and OMV analysis is needed.
Example 15.2 — Post-supply discount under s. 15(3)(b)
Year-end volume rebate to dealer
Facts: M/s SupplierCo and M/s DealerCo entered into a Dealership Agreement on 01.04.2024. Clause 7: ‘Volume rebate of 2% on annual purchases exceeding Rs. 8 crore.’ FY 2024-25 purchases = Rs. 10 crore. SupplierCo issues credit note on 31.03.2025 for Rs. 20 lakh (= 2% × Rs. 10 crore). Specifically references invoices in the credit note. DealerCo reverses proportionate ITC and provides written confirmation.
Step 1: Verify three conditions of s. 15(3)(b):
Step 2: (i) Pre-supply agreement — Dealership Agreement dated 01.04.2024 specifies the 2% rebate scheme. ✓
Step 3: (ii) Specifically linked to relevant invoices — Credit note lists all invoices. ✓
Step 4: (iii) Recipient ITC reversal — DealerCo's written confirmation on file. ✓
Step 5: All three conditions satisfied → discount excluded from taxable value.
Step 6: SupplierCo's output liability reduces by GST on Rs. 20 lakh (≈ Rs. 3.6 lakh at 18%).
Step 7: DealerCo's ITC reversed correspondingly.
Step 8: Credit note declared in GSTR-1 by 30 November 2025 (s. 34(2) outer limit).
Result: Discount accepted; revenue-neutral after recipient's reversal. WITHOUT contemporaneous agreement OR without recipient confirmation, the credit note is a mere accounting entry and supplier cannot reduce output liability.
Example 15.3 — Below-cost sale and Fiat India principle
Introductory pricing for new product
M/s NewProductCo launches a new beverage; for 6 months, sells at Rs. 100 (cost Rs. 130) for market penetration. Department may invoke Fiat India to seek cost-plus valuation. Defence: (i) SHORT-TERM duration (6 months) consistent with normal commercial introductory pricing; (ii) DOCUMENTED business rationale (competitive launch, market study); (iii) UNRELATED-party transaction (sole consideration is price; market penetration is mere commercial expectation, not extra-commercial consideration). Generally — short-term introductory pricing survives Fiat India. Long-term (over 1-2 years) below-cost sale attracts the doctrine.
PRACTITIONER PLANNING
• For every related-party supply — apply Rule 28 with second proviso check; document full-ITC eligibility of recipient.
• For below-cost sales — limit duration; document commercial rationale; cite Fiat India only where unavoidable.
• For post-supply discount schemes — draft pre-supply agreement; specify invoice-linkage; obtain recipient's ITC-reversal confirmation.
• For inclusions under sub-s. (2) — careful invoice design separating non-GST taxes, incidental expenses, and pure-agent reimbursements (excluded under Rule 33).
• For Government subsidies — establish non-price-linked nature for exclusion.
LITIGATION DEFENCE
• For Department challenge on related-party value — invoke Rule 28 second proviso where recipient eligible for full ITC.
• For Fiat India-type challenges — distinguish on duration, documented rationale, and absence of extra-commercial consideration.
• For post-supply discount denials — produce contemporaneous agreement; recipient's reversal confirmation; CA certificate.
• For inclusion challenges — separate pure-agent (Rule 33) from supplier expenses; structure invoice accordingly.
• For Schedule I distinct-person supplies — invoke Circular 199/11/2023-GST (cost recovery not always required).
CROSS-REFERENCES
• s. 2(31) ‘consideration’; s. 2(73) ‘market value’; s. 2(12) ‘associated enterprises’
• s. 7 + Schedule I — Supplies without consideration (distinct persons, related parties)
• s. 9 CGST — Charging; rate applied on value under s. 15
• s. 12, 13 — Time of supply
• s. 17(2) + Rules 42, 43 — ITC apportionment where exempt supplies present
• s. 34 CGST — Credit / debit notes for value adjustments
• Rules 27-35 CGST — Valuation Rules
• Customs Act s. 14 + Customs Valuation Rules — pre-GST analogue, persuasive jurisprudence