CHAPTER XII-G — SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO INCOME OF SHIPPING COMPANIES (TONNAGE TAX)
115VJ
ITA 1961 · Section 115VJ
Section 115VJ — Treatment of Common Costs
Chapter XII-G — Special Provisions Relating to Income of Shipping Companies (Tonnage Tax)ITA 1961Up to AY 2025-26
CHAPTER XII-G — SPECIAL PROVISIONS RELATING TO INCOME OF SHIPPING COMPANIES (TONNAGE TAX)
Section 115VJ — Treatment of common costs
Case Laws & Commentary · Income-tax Act, 1961 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026) · bharattax.co Treatise
Chapter / Part: Chapter XII-G (Special Provisions Relating to Income of Shipping Companies — the Tonnage Tax Scheme), inserted by the Finance (No. 2) Act, 2004 w.e.f. 1-4-2005 (AY 2005-06).
Finance Act, 2026: No amendment. The Finance Act, 2026 does not touch any section of Chapter XII-G (verified against the Finance Act, 2026 text).
Finance Act, 2025: Extended the Scheme to inland vessels (Inland Vessels Act, 2021) — inland-vessel words inserted across the Chapter w.e.f. 1-4-2026; s.115VP timeline/IFSC provisos also added. Text below is the in-force position for AY 2026-27.
A. SECTION COMMENTARY
1. Allocating shared costs and depreciation
Section 115VJ is a consequence of the 'separate business' fiction in s.115VE. Where a tonnage tax company also carries on non-tonnage business, common costs attributable to the tonnage tax business are to be determined on a reasonable basis [sub-s.(1)]; and depreciation on an asset (other than a qualifying ship) not used exclusively for the tonnage tax business is allocated between the two businesses in a fair proportion determined by the AO, having regard to the asset's use [sub-s.(2)]. The section prevents double-counting: costs and depreciation relatable to the (presumptively-taxed) tonnage business cannot also be set against the normally-taxed business.
2. The 'reasonable basis' standard
The provision deliberately adopts a 'reasonable basis' / 'fair proportion' standard rather than a rigid formula, leaving allocation to the facts subject to the AO's judgment. The Chennai Tribunal's reasoning in Four M Maritime — that the tonnage figure is a closed presumptive computation against which the normal disallowance machinery (s.14A) does not operate — supports a disciplined approach: only costs of the OTHER business are deductible in the normal computation, and the tonnage side neither absorbs nor releases deductions.
B. STATUTORY POSITION (verbatim operative text)
Section 115VJ, Income-tax Act, 1961 (Chapter XII-G):
115VJ. (1) Where a tonnage tax company also carries on any business or activity other than the tonnage tax business, common costs attributable to the tonnage tax business shall be determined on a reasonable basis.
(2) Where any asset, other than a qualifying ship, is not exclusively used for the tonnage tax business by the tonnage tax company, depreciation on such asset shall be allocated between its tonnage tax business and other business on a fair proportion to be determined by the Assessing Officer, having regard to the use of such asset for the purpose of the tonnage tax business and for the other business.
Unamended by the Finance Act, 2025 and the Finance Act, 2026.
C. AUTHORITIES
Candour note: No reported decision construes s.115VJ directly. The nearest authority is the Chennai Tribunal's treatment of the tonnage computation as a closed code (relevant to how common costs and disallowances interact).
C-1 Closed tonnage computation — cost/disallowance discipline
ACIT v. Four M Maritime (P) Ltd — [2015] 152 ITD 557 / 56 taxmann.com 348 (Chennai - Trib.)
Forum: Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Chennai Bench.
Provisions: Section 115VD (qualifying ship); Chapter XII-G read with s.14A and Rule 8D; s.115VL / s.115VG(6).
Held: (i) A ship transporting coal from one Indian port to another is a 'qualifying ship' for TTS (following the coastal-shipping line of West Asia Maritime). (ii) Once shipping income is computed under the self-contained presumptive code of Chapter XII-G, a disallowance under s.14A read with Rule 8D cannot be superimposed on that income — tonnage income is a deemed figure from which no further deduction or set-off is allowed, and correspondingly no s.14A disallowance is made against it.
Ratio / why it matters: Twin authority — reaffirms coastal-shipping eligibility under s.115VD, and establishes that the Chapter XII-G code displaces the normal computational machinery (including s.14A) in respect of tonnage income, supporting the 'general exclusion of deduction and set-off' philosophy of ss.115VL and 115VG(6).
C-2 Separate-business framing (Supreme Court)
CIT v. Trans Asian Shipping Services (P) Ltd — (2016) 385 ITR 637 (SC) / [2016] 71 taxmann.com 35 / (2016) 241 Taxman 30 (SC)
Forum / Bench: Supreme Court of India; T.S. Thakur CJI, A.K. Sikri J and R. Banumathi J. Judgment dated 5 July 2016, affirming the Kerala High Court and the Cochin Bench of the Tribunal.
Provisions: Sections 115VA, 115VB, 115VF, 115VG (including the s.115VG(4) Explanation on 'deemed tonnage') and 115VX, read with Rule 11Q; Chapter XII-G generally.
Issue: Whether income from 'slot charter' operations of a tonnage tax company can be included in 'tonnage income' under the Tonnage Tax Scheme (TTS) even where those operations are carried on in ships that are NOT the company's own 'qualifying ships' — and whether production of the tonnage certificate referred to in s.115VX is a pre-condition for computing such slot-charter income.
Held: Allowing the assessee, the Court held that although only income from operating a 'qualifying ship' is computed under Chapter XII-G, s.115VB expressly treats a company as 'operating a ship' even where only a PART of a ship has been chartered in under an arrangement such as slot charter, space charter or joint charter. A slot-charter arrangement is made with a shipping line and not in relation to an identified ship, so the carrying vessel (and its certificate) cannot be identified. The 'deemed tonnage' mechanism in the Explanation to s.115VG(4) — covering purchase of slots, slot charter and sharing of break-bulk vessel — was introduced precisely to capture such arrangements; to insist on a s.115VX certificate for slot charters would render deemed tonnage otiose. The s.115VX certificate requirement therefore does NOT apply to slot/space-charter operations and the slot-charter income is includible in tonnage income.
Ratio / why it matters: The leading — and only — Supreme Court authority on Chapter XII-G. It settles the architecture of the Scheme: (i) the charging provision is s.115VA read with s.115VF and s.115VG; (ii) the TTS is a 'preferential regime of taxation' to be construed to advance its object of making Indian shipping globally competitive (Rakesh Mohan Committee, January 2002); and (iii) 'deemed tonnage' is a distinct head of tonnage not dependent on a ship-specific certificate. The Court relied on CBDT Circular No. 5/2005 dated 15-7-2005 and reaffirmed that CBDT circulars explaining a scheme bind the Department.
Compiled for the bharattax.co Treatise on the Income-tax Act, 1961 (as amended by the Finance Act, 2026). Statutory text reproduced verbatim from the Income-tax Act, 1961 (text as in force on and after 1 April 2026, incorporating the inland-vessel insertions made by the Finance Act, 2025 with effect from 1 April 2026). Citations are stated as reported; tribunal and stay-stage orders are flagged as such. Where a section has not been judicially construed, that is stated candidly and the nearest governing authority is given. This material is for professional reference and is not legal advice.