BharatTax.co — Knowledge Portal
126

ITA 2025 · Section 126

Health Insurance Premia

Chapter VIII — DeductionsITA 2025Tax year 2026-27 onward

Section 126 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 80 D. Individual / HUF assessee allowed deduction for health insurance premium / preventive-health-checkup / medical-expenditure-on-senior-citizen-without-insurance. Limits: ₹ 25,000…

Section 126 — HEALTH INSURANCE PREMIA DEDUCTION (1961 s. 80D SUCCESSOR)

Section 126 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 80D. Individual / HUF assessee allowed deduction for health insurance premium / preventive-health-checkup / medical expenditure (for a senior citizen, only where uninsured: s.126(7); see the editorial note below). Limits: ₹ 25,000 (self + spouse + dependent children); ₹ 50,000 if any insured is senior citizen (60+); additional ₹ 25,000 / ₹ 50,000 for parents (similar split). Aggregate maximum: ₹ 1,00,000 if all four (self + parents) are senior citizens. Within the limits, ₹ 5,000 sub-cap for preventive health checkup. Available ONLY in OLD regime.

DEDUCTION SLABS

(I) SELF + SPOUSE + DEPENDENT CHILDREN: ₹ 25,000 per FY (premium + ₹ 5,000 preventive-checkup sub-limit); If any insured is SENIOR CITIZEN (60+), increase to ₹ 50,000. (II) PARENTS (whether dependent or not): Separate ₹ 25,000 per FY (₹ 50,000 if parent is senior citizen). (III) MEDICAL EXPENDITURE: For senior-citizen parents WITHOUT insurance, actual medical expenditure deductible up to ₹ 50,000. Total maximum (assessee SR + parents SR): ₹ 50K + ₹ 50K = ₹ 1 lakh. Mode of payment: Insurance premium MUST be by non-cash (cheque/online/UPI); preventive checkup may be in cash.

PLANNING NOTES

(i) For senior-citizen parents, choose between (a) annual health-insurance premium OR (b) actual medical-expenditure (₹ 50K cap) — whichever higher. (ii) Multi-year health-insurance premium (e.g., 3-year plan paid upfront) — proportionate yearly deduction permitted u/s 126. (iii) For preventive checkup, spread across family members to maximise ₹ 5K limit. (iv) Document mediclaim policy + premium-receipt + bank-debit; AO scrutiny common on health-deduction claims. (v) New regime forfeits — model OLD vs NEW carefully if health-insurance is significant deduction.

EDITORIAL NOTE — MEDICAL EXPENDITURE UNDER SECTION 126

Under the 1961 Act, the first proviso to section 80D(2) allowed medical expenditure only where it was paid "in respect of a senior citizen" and no amount had been paid to keep in force an insurance on that person's health. Section 126 of the 2025 Act is worded differently.

  • Sub-section (2)(c) allows medical expenditure "incurred on the health of the assessee or any member of his family", and sub-section (2)(d) medical expenditure on the health of any parent, each up to Rs 50,000. Neither clause says the person must be a senior citizen.
  • Sub-section (7) adds a condition only "where the amount is paid on account of medical expenditure incurred on the health of a senior citizen": the deduction is allowed if no amount has been paid to keep that person's health insurance in force.
  • Read on its words, medical expenditure on a person under 60 therefore falls within sub-section (2)(c) or (d), subject to the Rs 50,000 aggregate cap in sub-section (4), with no insurance condition.

The text does not say whether this wider reading was intended, and no circular or rule has addressed it. The difference matters only under the old regime: section 126 is not among the deductions allowed under section 202.

CROSS-REFERENCES

  • Section 127 — Disabled-dependant deduction.
  • Section 128 — Medical-treatment-of-specified-disease deduction.
  • Section 195 — New regime forfeit.