STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE Section 7 is a deeming provision — its purpose is to plug timing gaps between accrual and actual receipt. Without s. 7 , certain accumulations would escape taxation by virtue of not having been physically received…
7
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE Section 7 is a deeming provision — its purpose is to plug timing gaps between accrual and actual receipt. Without s. 7 , certain accumulations would escape taxation by virtue of not having been physically received…
Section 7 — INCOME DEEMED TO BE RECEIVED IN A TAX YEAR
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE
Section 7 is a deeming provision — its purpose is to plug timing gaps between accrual and actual receipt. Without s. 7, certain accumulations would escape taxation by virtue of not having been physically received in the relevant tax year. Three principal categories: (a) PF accretion in excess of statutory limits — deemed received; (b) Excess employer contribution to RPF / NPS / superannuation — deemed received as perquisite; (c) Inter-fund transfers (URPF to RPF) — deemed received.
JUDICIAL EVOLUTION — Vested Rights Crystallise as 'Received'
CIT v. L.W. Russel, (1964) 53 ITR 91 (SC) — employer's matching contribution to PF/superannuation becomes income only when vested rights crystallise; mere accumulation pending vesting does not amount to 'received' or 'due' salary.
HELD: The mere making of a contribution by the employer to a fund does not, by itself, give rise to income in the hands of the employee. The income arises only when the rights of the employee in the fund crystallise — when the contribution is vested in him absolutely. (per L.W. Russel ¶ 11).
JUDICIAL EVOLUTION — Excess Employer PF Contribution
CIT v. Larsen & Toubro Ltd., (2009) 313 ITR 1 (SC) — examined the s. 17(2)(vii) / s. 7(2) interaction; confirmed that excess employer contribution beyond the prescribed ceiling (now ₹7.5L per FA 2020 s. 17(2)(vii)) is taxable as perquisite, AND the annual accretion on such excess is taxable u/s 17(2)(viia).
DEPARTMENTAL PRACTICE
FA 2020 inserted s. 17(2)(vii) — employer contribution to RPF / NPS / approved superannuation in EXCESS of ₹7.5 lakh per FY is taxable as perquisite in the employee's hands. FA 2020 also inserted s. 17(2)(viia) — annual accretion (interest / dividend / similar income) on the excess contribution is also taxable. Income-tax Rules, 2026 Rule 3B prescribes the methodology for computing the annual accretion. Form 16 Part B reports both these amounts as perquisite components.
PLANNING NOTES & LITIGATION DEFENCE
(i) For high-CTC employees, monitor employer aggregate contribution to RPF + NPS + Superannuation — the ₹7.5L combined cap is per FY per employee. Excess triggers s. 17(2)(vii) perquisite tax. (ii) For employer-side, ensure correct Form 16 Part B reporting of s. 17(2)(vii)/(viia) — incorrect reporting attracts s. 271C TDS-default penalty. (iii) For employees withdrawing PF before 5 years of service, s. 192A TDS at 10% applies (Form 26Q reporting); withdrawal is taxable as 'salary in arrears' u/s 7. (iv) For inter-fund transfers (e.g., URPF → RPF on company recognition), the s. 7 deeming applies — verify that the URPF balance is shown as taxable receipt in the year of recognition.
CROSS-REFERENCES