Section 357 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 246 A -- the MASTER FIRST APPELLATE PROVISION enumerating orders appealable to COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) [CIT(A)]. The provision is the WORKHORSE first-appellate framework -- every…
357
ITA 2025 · Section 357
Section 357 — - APPEALABLE ORDERS BEFORE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS)
Section 357 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 246A -- the MASTER FIRST APPELLATE PROVISION enumerating orders appealable to COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) [CIT(A)]. The provision is the WORKHORSE first-appellate framework -- every taxpayer dissatisfied with AO/IAO order has CIT(A) as first-appellate destination (or JCIT(A) under s. 356 for smaller quantum). Post FA 2020, CIT(A) operates within FACELESS APPELLATE FRAMEWORK under National Faceless Appellate Centre (NFAC) -- physical hearings replaced by digital communication / VC personal hearings. The provision is one of the LARGEST procedural sections in Chapter XVIII covering 25+ categories of appealable orders.
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE -- 25+ APPEALABLE CATEGORIES
CIT(A) appeals available against orders under: (a) S. 270 -- assessment / intimation; (b) S. 271 -- best judgment assessment; (c) S. 273 -- faceless assessment; (d) S. 279 -- reassessment / income escaping; (e) S. 287 -- rectification of mistake; (f) S. 288 -- other amendments; (g) S. 289 -- notice of demand; (h) Various penalty orders -- s. 270A / 271 / 272 / 273 etc.; (i) TDS-related orders -- s. 393-401; (j) Trust regime orders -- s. 332/351 cancellation orders; (k) PAN orders -- s. 262; (l) Various procedural orders. EXCLUSIONS: (I) DRP-route orders (s. 275 / 1961 s. 144C) -- direct ITAT; (II) Block-assessment orders (s. 294) -- direct ITAT; (III) Approving Panel orders for GAAR (s. 274) -- direct ITAT; (IV) Specific revision orders under s. 377 / 378 -- separate framework. INCLUSION POST-FA 2017/2020: (a) Faceless assessment orders specifically appealable to CIT(A) / NFAC; (b) Updated-return assessments u/s 267; (c) ICDS-based adjustments.
FACELESS APPELLATE FRAMEWORK (POST FA 2020)
FA 2020 introduced FACELESS APPELLATE SCHEME -- CIT(A) operates remotely via NFAC. ARCHITECTURE: (a) National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC) Bengaluru -- coordinator; (b) Regional Faceless Appeal Centres (ReFACs); (c) APPEAL UNITS -- handle individual appeals; dynamic case allocation. PROCEDURAL FLOW: (I) Appellant files Form 35 via e-filing portal; (II) NFAC allocates to AU dynamically; (III) AO submits remand / response; (IV) AU may seek inquiry through Verification Unit; (V) Show-cause / hearing opportunity to assessee (FA 2022 personal hearing via VC); (VI) Draft appellate order; (VII) Review (where required); (VIII) FINAL APPELLATE ORDER. CARVE-OUTS from faceless: search-led appeals / international tax / specific complex cases retained at jurisdictional CIT(A).
CASE LAW
(i) CIT(A) jurisdiction varied litigation: PCIT v. Maruti Suzuki India (SC 2019) -- amalgamated company appellate jurisdiction. (ii) Various HC decisions on faceless appellate procedural defects: natural justice / personal-hearing / show-cause adequate. (iii) Recent: Bharat Aluminium / Madras HC parallel rulings (2021) on faceless framework natural-justice; FA 2022 codified personal hearing. (iv) PCIT v. Tata Communications (Bom HC) -- show-cause must be specific.
PRACTITIONER NOTES
(i) JURISDICTION CHECK -- s. 356 JCIT(A) for smaller quantum; s. 357 CIT(A) for larger; verify thresholds. (ii) FORM 35 COMPREHENSIVE -- precise grounds of appeal; statement of facts; documentary annexures; case-law citations. (iii) 30-DAY WINDOW -- strict; condonation requires reasonable cause / illness / etc. (iv) STAY OF DEMAND -- separate application u/s 360; protective during appeal. (v) PERSONAL HEARING REQUEST -- significant cases; preserve due-process. (vi) NFAC vs JURISDICTIONAL CIT(A) -- check applicable framework; faceless default for most. (vii) APPELLATE EVOLUTION -- if CIT(A) adverse, ITAT within 60 days; ITAT can take fresh evidence.
CROSS-REFERENCES