Section 270 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 143 -- THE MOST FREQUENTLY-INVOKED ASSESSMENT PROVISION in the Act, governing every taxpayer's return-processing under the central CPC system at Bangalore and AO scrutiny / NFAC…
270
Section 270 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 143 -- THE MOST FREQUENTLY-INVOKED ASSESSMENT PROVISION in the Act, governing every taxpayer's return-processing under the central CPC system at Bangalore and AO scrutiny / NFAC…
Section 270 — - ASSESSMENT
Section 270 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 143 -- THE MOST FREQUENTLY-INVOKED ASSESSMENT PROVISION in the Act, governing every taxpayer's return-processing under the central CPC system at Bangalore and AO scrutiny / NFAC pathways. The provision is one of the most consequential procedural sections (~9.3K bytes) covering: (1) auto-processing of returns under sub-s. (1) with six categories of adjustments [arithmetical / incorrect-claim / cross-year inconsistency / late-loss / audit-report-disallowance / Chapter-VIII-C-deduction-late-filing]; (2) communication to assessee with 30-day response window before adjustment; (3) loss-only-intimation; (4) 9-month outer-limit for sub-s. (1) intimation; (5)-(10) scrutiny assessment / regular-assessment / faceless-assessment integration. POST FA 2020 IDENTIFIES TWO ASSESSMENT ARMS: (a) AUTO-PROCESSING under CPC-Bangalore (sub-ss. 1-5) -- desk-based summary; (b) SCRUTINY ASSESSMENT under NFAC / Faceless Assessment Scheme (sub-ss. 6-10) -- comprehensive examination, e-proceedings only post FA 2020.
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE -- TWO-ARM ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK
ARM 1 -- AUTO-PROCESSING (sub-ss. 1-5): every return filed under s. 263 (or in response to s. 268(1) inquiry notice) goes through CPC-Bangalore auto-processing. Six categories of permissible adjustments under sub-s. (1)(a)(i)-(vi): (i) ARITHMETICAL ERROR -- incorrect addition / subtraction / multiplication etc.; (ii) INCORRECT CLAIM apparent from any information in the return -- e.g., 80C deduction claimed for non-eligible items; (iii) CROSS-YEAR INCONSISTENCY -- inconsistency with information from preceding year's return as may be prescribed (Rule 12 / equivalent under 2026 Rules); (iv) LATE-LOSS DISALLOWANCE -- loss-set-off claimed where loss-year's return was filed beyond s. 263(1) due date; (v) AUDIT REPORT DISALLOWANCE -- expenditure / income increase indicated in audit report (Form 3CD) but not in return; (vi) CHAPTER VIII-C DEDUCTION DISALLOWANCE -- deduction claimed under any of ss. 122-148 if return filed beyond s. 263(1) due date. (Note: words 'under section 144 or' omitted by FA 2026 effective 1-Apr-2026.) PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARD (sub-s. 2): before any sub-s. (1)(a) adjustment, COMMUNICATION must be given to assessee in writing / electronic mode; 30-DAY response window; non-response treated as concurrence. FA 2016 introduced this critical safeguard. OUTCOME (sub-s. 1(d)): INTIMATION to assessee specifying tax payable / refund due. REFUND PROCESSING (sub-s. 1(e)): refund granted on auto-processing. TIMING LIMIT (sub-s. 4): 9 MONTHS from end of FY in which return filed (FA 2024 reduced from 12 months). After this, no sub-s. (1) intimation can be issued.
ARM 2 -- SCRUTINY ASSESSMENT (sub-ss. 6-10)
Sub-s. (6) authorises AO / NFAC to issue NOTICE under sub-s. (6) (1961 s. 143(2)) calling for documents / examining the return for completeness / correctness. SCRUTINY SELECTION via: (i) Computer-Assisted-Scrutiny-Selection (CASS) -- algorithm-based; (ii) Manual selection by AO based on parameters (high-value transactions / mismatches / etc.). TIMELINE: notice must be served WITHIN 3 MONTHS from end of relevant FY in which return filed (FA 2021 reduced from 6 months). FACELESS FRAMEWORK (post FA 2020 / s. 273): under National Faceless Assessment Centre (NFAC) Bengaluru: (a) Notice issued to taxpayer through e-portal; (b) Response submitted online; (c) Cases assigned dynamically to Assessment Units (AUs) located across India; (d) Verification Units (VUs) handle inquiries; (e) Technical Units (TUs) provide technical assistance; (f) Review Units (RUs) review draft assessments; (g) Final order via DRAFT-ASSESSMENT-ORDER process (sub-s. 10 read with s. 274 PCIT reference / s. 275 DRP). SUB-S. (10) ASSESSMENT ORDER: AO determines total income / total loss / tax payable / refund due. Assessee may seek personal hearing under FA 2022 amendment (face-to-face video conference). ALTERNATIVE: BEST-JUDGMENT ASSESSMENT under s. 271 (1961 s. 144) where return not filed / non-response to notices / books not produced.
CASE LAW -- LEADING DECISIONS
(i) ACIT v. Hotel Blue Moon (SC, 2010, 321 ITR 362) -- pre-FA 2016 sub-s. (1) intimation: auto-processing by CPC valid; AO cannot adjust beyond enumerated categories. (ii) CIT v. Industrial Engineering Projects (Del HC) -- 30-day response window; AO must consider response before adjustment. (iii) CIT v. Sri Krishna Bhandar Trust -- intimation under s. 143(1) is appealable u/s 246A (now s. 357 of 2025 Act) -- can be challenged before CIT(A). (iv) Faceless Scheme litigation (post-2020): natural-justice principles -- show-cause / personal-hearing / opportunity-to-respond mandatorily required. (v) PCIT v. Sahara India Mutual Benefit (Del HC) -- scrutiny notice timeliness (3-month limit); time-limit strictly enforced. (vi) FA 2024 / FA 2026 amendments and CBDT Notifications -- governing latest faceless mechanics.
PLANNING NOTES (TWELVE AREAS)
(i) RETURN PRECISION -- minimise auto-processing adjustments; cross-check arithmetical / Form 26AS / AIS / TIS information before filing. (ii) AUDIT REPORT (FORM 3CD) RECONCILIATION -- expenditure / income in Form 3CD must be in return; mismatch triggers sub-s. (1)(a)(v). (iii) PRIOR-YEAR INCONSISTENCY -- review preceding-year return for Schedule mismatches; especially significant for business loss / depreciation c/f. (iv) LATE-LOSS RETURN -- file LOSS RETURN by ORIGINAL due date (sub-s. 263(1)) for c/f eligibility; belated loss-return disqualifies under sub-s. (1)(a)(iv). (v) CHAPTER VIII-C TIMING -- claim Chapter VIII-C deductions only in returns filed by due date; late filing disqualifies under sub-s. (1)(a)(vi). (vi) 30-DAY RESPONSE -- monitor e-filing portal for sub-s. (2) communications; non-response = adjustment. (vii) 9-MONTH WATCH -- intimation must come within 9 months; beyond that period, sub-s. (1) cannot be invoked. (viii) SCRUTINY NOTICE 3-MONTH WINDOW -- if no scrutiny notice within 3 months of FY-end, assessee CAN treat return as accepted. (ix) FACELESS SUBMISSIONS -- comprehensive documentation; all records uploaded; no piecemeal submission. (x) PERSONAL HEARING REQUEST -- exercise right under FA 2022; especially in complex cases; preserves due-process protection. (xi) DRAFT ASSESSMENT REVIEW -- review draft order carefully before finalisation; assessee has limited window to object. (xii) APPEAL FROM s. 270 -- CIT(A) appeal (s. 357) within 30 days of order; orders both under sub-s. (1) and sub-ss. (6)-(10) appealable.
CROSS-REFERENCES