BharatTax.co — Knowledge Portal
275

ITA 2025 · Section 275

Reference to DRP

Section 275 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 144 C -- the DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL (DRP) framework, specifically targeting eligible-assessee cases including: (a) any FOREIGN COMPANY; (b) any case involving INTERNATIONAL…

Section 275 — - REFERENCE TO DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL

Section 275 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 144C -- the DISPUTE RESOLUTION PANEL (DRP) framework, specifically targeting eligible-assessee cases including: (a) any FOREIGN COMPANY; (b) any case involving INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION (s. 161 TP); (c) eligible-assessees with VARIATION proposed by AO. The provision establishes a SPECIALISED PRE-ASSESSMENT REVIEW BOARD comprising 3 senior-level CITs (Pr CIT / CIT level) at major centres (Mumbai / Delhi / Chennai / Kolkata / Bangalore / Ahmedabad / Hyderabad). DRP issues binding directions to AO; AO must follow. Assessee gets specialised review WITHOUT going to CIT(A); decisions can be challenged at ITAT directly. The provision is critical for high-stakes TP / international tax cases; significantly improves dispute resolution speed compared to traditional appellate channels.

STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE

ELIGIBLE ASSESSEE: (a) Any FOREIGN COMPANY; OR (b) Any person in respect of whom variation in income / loss is proposed and the case involves INTERNATIONAL TRANSACTION; OR (c) Any case where AO proposes variation referred from TPO under s. 166 (TP-determined ALP). PROCESS: (I) AO PASSES DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER (NOT FINAL); (II) Assessee receives draft order; 30-day objection window; (III) Assessee can: (a) ACCEPT draft -- AO finalises; OR (b) FILE OBJECTIONS with DRP within 30 days; (IV) DRP composed of 3 senior officers (PCIT/CIT level); meets at major centres; (V) DRP examines objections; calls for AO's response; may call assessee for personal hearing; (VI) DRP issues DIRECTIONS to AO -- BINDING; assessee + AO must follow; (VII) AO finalises assessment per DRP directions WITHIN 1 MONTH of receipt; (VIII) DRP must complete within 9 MONTHS from end of month draft order issued. DRP DIRECTIONS POWERS: confirm / reduce / enhance variation; ONE-WAY POWER -- can reduce but cannot increase variation beyond AO's draft.

APPELLATE ROUTE POST-DRP

Final assessment per DRP directions APPEALABLE DIRECTLY TO ITAT (skip CIT(A) under s. 357). Two strategic implications: (i) FASTER RESOLUTION -- typical timeline 2-3 years from objection to ITAT decision; vs traditional CIT(A) + ITAT route 4-6 years; (ii) NO CIT(A) FILTERING -- ITAT first appellate; both AO and assessee may appeal. PRACTITIONER STRATEGY: for high-stakes TP / international cases, DRP route preferred over conventional appellate. Engage TP / international tax specialist; comprehensive objection-bundle within 30 days.

CASE LAW / DRP DECISIONS

(i) PCIT v. Vodafone India Services (Bom HC, 2014) -- DRP framework applies; foreign company status. (ii) Maruti Suzuki India v. CIT (Del HC) -- AMP TP cases via DRP. (iii) Various ITAT decisions on DRP procedural fairness. (iv) DRP statistics show 70-80% partial / full relief in eligible cases.

PLANNING NOTES

(i) DRAFT-ORDER MONITORING -- e-portal vigilance; 30-day objection window strict. (ii) OBJECTION DOCUMENTATION -- comprehensive; DRP relies heavily on objection-quality. (iii) PERSONAL HEARING REQUEST -- DRP allows VC hearing on request; useful for complex factual matters. (iv) DRP CHOICE FOR FOREIGN CO -- automatic eligibility; verify status. (v) ITAT APPEAL PREPARATION -- post-DRP final order, ITAT route within 60 days.

CROSS-REFERENCES

  • Section 161 -- TP charging.
  • Section 166 -- TPO reference.
  • Section 270 -- Assessment.
  • Section 273 -- Faceless Assessment.
  • Section 286 -- Time limit (9-month DRP extension).
  • Sections 361-364 -- ITAT framework.
  • CBDT DRP Notification.