Section 164 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 92 BA -- the definition of SPECIFIED DOMESTIC TRANSACTION (SDT) bringing certain DOMESTIC AE-style transactions into the TP net. SDT was originally introduced FA 2012 to address…
164
ITA 2025 · Section 164
Section 164 — - MEANING OF SPECIFIED DOMESTIC TRANSACTION
Section 164 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 92BA -- the definition of SPECIFIED DOMESTIC TRANSACTION (SDT) bringing certain DOMESTIC AE-style transactions into the TP net. SDT was originally introduced FA 2012 to address profit-shifting through s. 80-IA / 80-IC tax-holiday units (transferring goods / services to non-tax-holiday units at non-arm's-length-prices). FA 2017 substantially CURTAILED SDT by removing s. 40A(2)(b) related-party transactions from the scope (which had been the broadest trigger). Current scope is narrow: transactions between (a) tax-holiday-unit and same-group non-tax-holiday-unit; (b) transactions referred to in s. 80-IA(8)/(10) / s. 80-IB / 80-IC etc. equivalent provisions in 2025 Act; (c) other domestic profit-shielded category transactions where prescribed thresholds met. Practitioner: most domestic group-companies post-FA 2017 are OUTSIDE SDT scope; only specific tax-holiday / SEZ / 80-IA / Section 138/139 (industrial undertakings) interactions remain within.
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE
POST-FA 2017 narrowed scope: SDT covers transactions between domestic enterprises in nature of: (a) Cross-unit transactions between TAX-HOLIDAY unit (e.g., SEZ s. 144 of 2025 Act / s. 80-IA(4) industrial undertaking) and non-tax-holiday unit of SAME assessee or AE -- to prevent profit-shifting that would inflate exempt-unit's profit and reduce taxable-unit's. (b) Cross-unit transactions in 80-IA / 80-IB style claims (s. 80-IA(8)/(10) equivalents in 2025 Act -- e.g., s. 137-148 industrial / SEZ / housing / IFSC / inter-corporate-dividend deductions). (c) Transactions REFERRED TO under those provisions where AO has reasons to believe profits inflated by transfer-pricing arrangements. MONETARY THRESHOLD: aggregate of SDT during tax year must exceed prescribed amount (currently INR 20 crore -- raised from earlier INR 5 crore in FA 2017 narrowing). Below threshold, no SDT compliance. Pre-FA 2017 scope INCLUDED s. 40A(2)(b) related-party expenditures (covering all closely-held company transactions with directors / shareholders / relatives) -- this was the broadest and most-contested trigger; FA 2017 removed it leaving s. 40A(2)(b) compliance to general PGBP audit (Form 3CD clauses 22-23) without TP overlay.
PLANNING NOTES
(i) THRESHOLD MONITORING -- INR 20 crore aggregate SDT triggers Form 3CEB; below, no SDT compliance. (ii) SEZ / 80-IA / 80-IC INTERACTION -- maintain separate ledgers for tax-holiday vs taxable units; cross-unit transfers documented at ALP. (iii) S. 40A(2)(b) POST-FA 2017 -- relevant for general PGBP disallowance under s. 35 (now of 2025 Act) but NOT for TP-Form 3CEB; document related-party transactions in Form 3CD.
CROSS-REFERENCES