Section 273 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 144 B -- the FACELESS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK introduced FA 2020 and operationalised by CBDT Notification dated 13-Aug-2020. The provision establishes the DIGITAL-ONLY ASSESSMENT…
273
ITA 2025 · Section 273
Section 273 — - FACELESS ASSESSMENT
Section 273 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 144B -- the FACELESS ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK introduced FA 2020 and operationalised by CBDT Notification dated 13-Aug-2020. The provision establishes the DIGITAL-ONLY ASSESSMENT ARCHITECTURE with NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NFAC) Bengaluru as central hub, supported by REGIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRES (ReFACs), Assessment Units (AUs), Verification Units (VUs), Technical Units (TUs), and Review Units (RUs) located across India. Section 273 mandates that assessment under sub-ss. 6-10 of s. 270 / s. 271 (best-judgment) shall be CONDUCTED IN A FACELESS MANNER -- no physical interface between AO and assessee; all communications via e-portal; dynamic case allocation; review-board mechanism. The architecture replaces the traditional jurisdictional-AO-based assessment with a centralised algorithmic-allocation system. Practitioner-grade rule: every scrutiny case post-2020 follows faceless mechanics; physical hearing only in personal-hearing requests under FA 2022.
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE -- THE NFAC FRAMEWORK
ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE: (I) NATIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRE (NFAC) Bengaluru -- apex coordinating body; allocates cases / coordinates units / receives final orders. (II) REGIONAL FACELESS ASSESSMENT CENTRES (ReFACs) -- 10+ across major cities (Mumbai / Delhi / Chennai / Kolkata / Bengaluru / Ahmedabad / Hyderabad / Pune / Chandigarh / etc.); supervisory level. (III) ASSESSMENT UNITS (AUs) -- conduct primary assessment; AO-equivalent unit; multiple AUs per ReFAC. (IV) VERIFICATION UNITS (VUs) -- handle inquiries / cross-verification of information / physical-on-site-inquiry where unavoidable. (V) TECHNICAL UNITS (TUs) -- specialised technical / legal / accountancy assistance to AUs (TP / international tax / sectoral expertise). (VI) REVIEW UNITS (RUs) -- review draft assessment orders before finalisation; check legal / factual soundness; high-quality control mechanism. PROCEDURAL FLOW: (a) Notice issued by NFAC to assessee through e-portal; (b) Response submitted online via e-filing; (c) Case dynamically allocated to AU (anywhere in India; no jurisdictional bias); (d) AU may seek inquiry through VU / technical input through TU; (e) AU prepares DRAFT ASSESSMENT ORDER; (f) Draft sent to RU for review; (g) Show-cause notice / personal-hearing opportunity (FA 2022) to assessee; (h) Assessee submits response; (i) AU finalises with RU's input; (j) FINAL ASSESSMENT ORDER issued through NFAC.
PERSONAL HEARING (FA 2022 EXPANSION)
PRE-FA 2022: faceless assessment was strict text/document-only; no oral interaction. POST FA 2022 (sub-s. 6/7 equivalent): assessee may REQUEST personal hearing via video conference where: (a) Variation prejudicial to assessee proposed in draft order; OR (b) Specific provisions allow oral hearing. Hearing conducted via VC / video conferencing facility set up at ReFAC; recorded for record. Critical procedural protection -- restored due-process guarantees post natural-justice concerns raised by Bombay HC / Madras HC / Delhi HC in 2020-2021.
EXCLUSIONS / CARVE-OUTS
Faceless framework does NOT apply to: (a) Search-and-seizure assessments under s. 247 / 1961 s. 132 (handled by Investigation wing, jurisdictional); (b) Surveys under s. 253 / 1961 s. 133A (handled by jurisdictional AO); (c) International transactions / TP-driven assessments under ss. 161-166 (handled by TPO with own faceless TP scheme); (d) Cases requiring physical inquiry impossible to handle remotely; (e) Cases at PCIT/CIT level review under s. 274 (different framework). Other notable: charitable trust registration / 80G approval / PCIT revisions handled separately under their own faceless schemes (per CBDT Notifications 2021-2024).
CASE LAW / NATURAL-JUSTICE LITIGATION
(i) Bharat Aluminium Co. Ltd v. UoI (Bom HC, 2021) -- early faceless assessment without personal hearing; HC remanded for de novo with hearing. (ii) Madras HC / Delhi HC parallel rulings (2021) -- natural justice / personal hearing right preserved despite faceless. (iii) FA 2022 codified personal-hearing right via VC. (iv) Various ITAT decisions on faceless-assessment procedural defects -- show-cause inadequate / response time too short / etc. -- typically remanded for re-assessment with proper procedure. (v) PCIT v. Bhakra Beas Management Board (Del HC, 2023) -- faceless assessment quashed for inadequate show-cause; AO must reasonably explain proposed variation.
PRACTITIONER NOTES (NINE AREAS)
(i) E-PORTAL VIGILANCE -- check e-filing portal regularly; faceless notices arrive without physical communication. (ii) RESPONSE DEADLINE -- typical 7-15 days per notice; comprehensive single-response preferred over piecemeal. (iii) DOCUMENTATION -- upload all supporting evidence; no further opportunity once draft order issued. (iv) PERSONAL HEARING REQUEST -- request VC hearing in significant cases (variation > INR 10L typical threshold); preserves due process. (v) DRAFT ORDER REVIEW -- when draft order issued, scrutinise basis; respond to specific items; case law citations. (vi) NATURAL JUSTICE DEFENCE -- if AO fails to provide adequate show-cause / hearing, raise this in CIT(A) appeal -- often successful. (vii) DRP ROUTE -- for TP / international tax cases > INR 10 cr variation, DRP under s. 275 mandatory route. (viii) NFAC vs JURISDICTIONAL AO -- physical AO retains jurisdiction for collection / recovery / search-led / NRI-specific cases. (ix) APPEAL ROUTE -- CIT(A) under s. 357 / NFAC-Appellate (post FA 2020 also faceless); subsequent ITAT direct.
CROSS-REFERENCES