Section 280 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 148 -- the formal NOTICE provision triggering reassessment proceedings under s. 279 . The provision authorises AO to issue notice requiring assessee to file return for the year in…
280
ITA 2025 · Section 280
Section 280 — - ISSUE OF NOTICE WHERE INCOME HAS ESCAPED ASSESSMENT
Section 280 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 148 -- the formal NOTICE provision triggering reassessment proceedings under s. 279. The provision authorises AO to issue notice requiring assessee to file return for the year in question; once such notice is issued and complied with, the AO can proceed to reassess. POST FA 2021 RESTRUCTURING: notice under s. 280 can ONLY be issued after compliance with PRE-NOTICE PROCEDURE under s. 281 (1961 s. 148A) -- mandatory show-cause + opportunity to respond. The provision is the GATEWAY to reassessment; jurisdictional defects render entire reassessment void.
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE
PRECONDITION (post FA 2021): (I) Information suggesting income has escaped assessment under s. 279; (II) MANDATORY pre-notice procedure under s. 281 (show-cause + assessee response + AO order); (III) SANCTION by appropriate senior authority under s. 284 (PCIT/CIT/PCCIT level depending on year). ONLY THEN s. 280 NOTICE issued. NOTICE CONTENT (sub-s. 1): (a) Specifies relevant tax year; (b) Requires assessee to FILE RETURN; (c) Treats earlier filed return as if filed in response (if any); (d) Time-window typically 30 days for compliance. POST NOTICE: AO proceeds to assess / reassess under s. 270 procedure (faceless / scrutiny / etc.). TIME-WINDOW per s. 282: (a) 3 YEARS from end of relevant tax year -- normal cases; (b) 5 YEARS where escape > INR 50 lakh; (c) 10 YEARS for search-cases / exceptional escape (FA 2024 reduced from 11 years).
FA 2021 RESTRUCTURING IMPACT
PRE-FA 2021: AO could issue s. 148 notice based on 'reason to believe'; subjective standard; large litigation. POST FA 2021: (a) STANDARD: 'information suggesting' -- objective basis; specific information from prescribed sources; (b) PRE-NOTICE PROCEDURE under s. 281 mandatory; (c) SHORTER TIME-WINDOWS (3/5/10 vs old 4/6/16); (d) HIGHER-LEVEL SANCTION required (PCIT/CIT for normal; PCCIT for >5-year). Effect: stronger procedural safeguards; reduced reopening; assessees better protected.
CASE LAW
(i) GKN Driveshafts (India) Ltd v. ITO (SC, 2003) -- pre-FA 2021 challenge: assessee can challenge reasons via writ before participating. (ii) PCIT v. Bhargava Family Trust (Bom HC, 2024) -- post-FA 2021 procedural defects render notice void. (iii) Various HC decisions: time-limit defence; sanction validity; pre-notice procedure compliance. (iv) Recent ITAT post-FA 2021 cases on s. 280 / 281 procedural challenges.
PRACTITIONER NOTES
(i) PRE-NOTICE COMPLIANCE -- s. 281 procedure mandatory; non-compliance = void notice. (ii) SANCTION VALIDATION -- check authority level (PCIT/CIT/PCCIT based on year); incorrect-level = invalid. (iii) TIME-LIMIT DEFENCE -- s. 282 limits strict; barred-by-time defence. (iv) RETURN FILING -- response within 30 days; treat as new return; preserve all original positions. (v) WRIT JURISDICTION -- early-stage challenge to s. 280 / 281 via writ at HC. (vi) APPELLATE PRESERVATION -- post-reassessment, CIT(A) / NFAC appeal within 30 days; subsequent ITAT.
CROSS-REFERENCES