BharatTax.co — Knowledge Portal
392

ITA 2025 · Section 392

Salary TDS

Section 392 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 corresponds substantively to sections 192 and 192A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is the cornerstone TDS provision for employer-employee remuneration, accommodating the dual-regime architecture…

Section 392 — - TDS ON SALARY AND ACCUMULATED BALANCE OF RECOGNISED PROVIDENT FUND

Section 392 of the Income-tax Act, 2025 corresponds substantively to sections 192 and 192A of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It is the cornerstone TDS provision for employer-employee remuneration, accommodating the dual-regime architecture (default new regime under s. 202 / s. 115BAC of 1961 and optional old regime), and integrating the FA 2020 rule for taxing employer's contribution to specified funds in excess of INR 7.5 lakhs and the FA 2021 mechanism for adjustment for past employer.

STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE & SCOPE

Section 392 is the salary TDS provision and is the most widely-applied TDS section in the Act. Every employer making a payment chargeable under the head "Salaries" is required to deduct income-tax at the average rate of income-tax computed on the basis of the rates in force for the financial year in which payment is made on the estimated income of the assessee under that head.

AVERAGE-RATE COMPUTATION (sub-sections (1)-(2))

Average rate is the rate of tax computed on estimated total salary income for the FY divided by such estimated income. The employer is bound to compute on a month-by-month basis but may align with actual payments. Rate = (Tax on estimated income for FY) / (Estimated income for FY). The default regime is the new regime under the s. 202 framework (analog to s. 115BAC); the employee may opt for the old regime by furnishing a declaration in Form 10-IEA-equivalent before 1st April or upon joining.

OTHER INCOME / TDS ADJUSTMENT (sub-section (3))

The employer is permitted (and is expected on a request from employee) to take into account income from other heads and TDS on such income, in computing the tax to be deducted from salary. Loss under the head "Income from house property" up to INR 2 lakhs is allowed (CBDT Circular No. 8/2013). The employee must furnish a declaration in writing with verification.

MULTIPLE EMPLOYERS (sub-section (4))

Where the assessee is employed simultaneously under more than one employer, or has changed employment in the FY, the assessee may furnish to the chosen employer details of salary received from the other employer(s) and tax deducted, so that the chosen employer can compute aggregated TDS. Form 12B is the prescribed format under the 1961 framework; the 2025 framework continues this mechanism.

PAST-EMPLOYER ADJUSTMENT (sub-section (5))

Sub-section (5) introduces the FA 2024 (effective 1-10-2024) mechanism whereby the new employer can give credit for TDS deducted by past employer. The employee furnishes Form 12BAA with details. This eliminates double TDS suffered earlier in mid-year job changes.

EMPLOYER CONTRIBUTIONS > INR 7.5 LAKHS (sub-section (6))

Aggregate of employer's contribution to (a) recognised provident fund, (b) approved superannuation fund and (c) NPS account exceeding INR 7.5 lakhs in a year is a perquisite under s. 17(2) [FA 2020]. The accretion (interest/dividend earned) on excess contribution is also taxable under Rule 3B mechanism. Section 392 builds this into TDS computation.

PERQUISITE TAX PAID BY EMPLOYER (sub-section (7))

Where employer chooses to pay tax on non-monetary perquisites at his cost, that tax is itself a perquisite-on-perquisite (analog to s. 192(1A)/(1B) of 1961). Sub-section (7) operationalises the mechanism: tax-on-tax computed on cost-to-employer perquisites is paid by employer and is not taxable in employee's hands.

RPF ACCUMULATED BALANCE TDS (sub-sections (8)-(10) / 1961 s. 192A)

On premature withdrawal from RPF (within 5 years of service) where the accumulated balance becomes taxable under Rule 8 of Part A of Fourth Schedule, the trustee/authorised person is required to deduct TDS at 10% if balance exceeds INR 50,000. PAN-less withdrawals attract maximum marginal rate.

FA AMENDMENT TIMELINE

  • FA 1987 -- s. 192 enacted in current form; average-rate principle established.
  • FA 2002 -- s. 192(1A)/(1B) introduced for tax-paid-by-employer mechanism.
  • FA 2002 (1-6-2002) -- s. 192(2B) introduced allowing other-income adjustment.
  • Circular No. 8/2013 -- house property loss adjustment recognised.
  • FA 2015 (1-6-2015) -- s. 192A introduced for RPF withdrawal.
  • FA 2020 (1-4-2021) -- INR 7.5 lakh employer-contribution-cap perquisite.
  • FA 2020 -- s. 115BAC default new regime (Personal Tax).
  • FA 2023 -- s. 115BAC default for individuals/HUFs/AOPs.
  • FA 2024 (1-10-2024) -- past-employer adjustment via Form 12BAA.

PRACTITIONER PLANNING NOTES

  • April-quarter declaration of regime: secure employee's option in writing (default new regime; old regime requires affirmative election); document the election to defend against subsequent dispute.
  • Form 12B (multiple-employer): obtain from new joiner; aggregate prior salary and TDS to compute true tax liability for remaining months.
  • Form 12BAA (FA 2024): the new employer can give credit for past employer's TDS -- this is critical for mid-year transitions; without it, employee suffers excess TDS and must wait for refund.
  • House property loss: cap at INR 2 lakhs (set-off rule); obtain rent receipts, interest certificate, and self-occupation / let-out declaration.
  • Other income disclosure: rent income, FD interest -- include in salary TDS computation only on employee request; otherwise the employee handles via advance tax / self-assessment.
  • LTC, HRA, leave encashment, gratuity: each has separate regime -- HRA needs landlord PAN if rent > INR 1 lakh p.a. (FA 2017); gratuity exempt up to INR 20 lakhs s. 10(10) [s. 11 of 2025].
  • Tax-on-non-monetary-perquisite mechanism (sub-section (7)): useful for executives where employer wishes to provide tax-protected perquisites; ensure tax-on-tax computed correctly at average rate.
  • Excess employer contribution > INR 7.5 lakh: monitor RPF + SAF + NPS aggregate; for high-CTC employees this readily triggers the perquisite -- adjust salary structure (e.g., shift to NPS Tier-1 with cap awareness).
  • Premature RPF withdrawal: counsel employee -- if withdrawal within 5 years, TDS @ 10% on accumulated balance > INR 50,000; can be avoided by transferring to new employer's RPF (no TDS).
  • PAN compliance: missing PAN triggers maximum-marginal-rate TDS under s. 393 / s. 206AA; insist on PAN at on-boarding.
  • Quarterly return Form 24Q: report salary breakup in Annexure II for Q4; reconcile with Form 16 issued by 15-Jun.
  • Form 16 issuance: TRACES-generated Part A + employer's Part B by 15-Jun (FY-end + 75 days); failure attracts s. 271H penalty (1961) / s. 446 (2025) of INR 100/day per default capped at TDS amount.

WORKED EXAMPLE -- AVERAGE RATE COMPUTATION FY 2026-27 (NEW REGIME DEFAULT)

Estimated salary FY 2026-27 = INR 12,00,000. Standard deduction (s. 19) = INR 75,000. Net taxable = INR 11,25,000. Tax (s. 202 new regime FY 26-27 slabs assumed): 0 up to 4L; 5% on next 4L = 20,000; 10% on next 4L = 30,000 (truncated to 1.25L * 10% = 12,500). Total tax (illustrative) = INR 32,500. Add 4% cess = INR 1,300. Total = INR 33,800. Average rate = 33,800 / 11,25,000 = 3.005%. Monthly TDS = 33,800 / 12 = INR 2,817 (rounded).

CASE-LAW DIGEST

  • CIT v. Larsen & Toubro Ltd. (2009) 313 ITR 1 (SC) -- employer's bona fide estimate of perquisite is not 'short-deduction'.
  • Eli Lilly & Co. (India) (2009) 312 ITR 225 (SC) -- expatriate salary; offshore portion taxable in India where services rendered in India.
  • Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. v. CIT (2007) 293 ITR 226 (SC) -- deductor not in default if deductee has paid tax.
  • Yashpal Sahni v. Rekha Hajarnavis (2007) 165 Taxman 144 (Bom) -- TDS deducted but not paid; employer cannot recover from employee; employee's tax liability stands discharged.
  • Kanchanganga Sea Foods Ltd. v. CIT (2010) 325 ITR 540 (SC) -- TDS on payments made outside India; territorial scope.
  • Bharti Cellular Ltd. (2010) 193 Taxman 97 (SC) -- 'human element' relevance for technical services TDS.
  • CIT v. ITC Ltd. (2016) 384 ITR 14 (SC) -- tip distribution by employer not 'salary' for TDS.

CROSS-REFERENCES

  • s. 17 (1961) / s. 18 (2025) -- Salary head computation.
  • s. 19 (2025) -- Standard deduction (INR 50,000 / 75,000 new regime).
  • s. 115BAC (1961) / s. 202 (2025) -- new tax regime default.
  • s. 391 -- direct payment by assessee (residual).
  • s. 397 -- TDS quarterly return (Form 24Q).
  • s. 398 -- consequences of failure to deduct.
  • s. 446 / s. 447 (2025 penalty Chapter) -- TDS-related penalties.
  • Rule 3 (Perquisites valuation), Rule 26C (HRA), Rule 26A (multiple employers).