Section 73 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 49 . It prescribes the cost of acquisition for capital assets acquired through 24 specific 'special modes' — gift / will / inheritance / liquidation / trust / amalgamation / demerger /…
73
ITA 2025 · Section 73
Section 73 — COST OF ACQUISITION IN SPECIAL MODES (24-ROW TABLE)
Section 73 is the substantive equivalent of 1961 s. 49. It prescribes the cost of acquisition for capital assets acquired through 24 specific 'special modes' — gift / will / inheritance / liquidation / trust / amalgamation / demerger / business reorganisation / specified-securities (sweat equity / ESOP) / GDR redemption / mutual-fund consolidation / segregated portfolio / corporatisation of stock exchange / co-operative bank reorganisation / Electronic Gold Receipts / and more. Theme: cost-base CONTINUITY across non-transfer / restructuring events — the cost is typically inherited from the previous owner OR a formula-derived equivalent.
STATUTORY ARCHITECTURE
Section 73 codifies the cost-base CONTINUITY principle across 24 distinct fact-patterns. The unifying logic: where a transfer is tax-NEUTRAL under s. 70 (or via similar non-transfer events like inheritance / gift / liquidation), the transferee inherits the previous owner's cost-base — not a fresh / market-value cost. On subsequent disposal by the transferee, the original-owner-acquisition-cost provides the cost-base for s. 72 computation. Holding-period continuity (s. 2(101) Explanation) operates in tandem — the previous owner's holding period clubs into the transferee's.
MAJOR FAMILIES OF SPECIAL MODES
(I) FAMILY/GRATUITOUS: Sl. No. 1 — gift / will / inheritance / HUF distribution / trust transfers / s. 70 carved-out modes. Cost = previous owner's cost + improvement borne by previous owner OR assessee. (II) AMALGAMATION/DEMERGER: Sl. No. 2 (shareholder share-swap), Sl. Nos. 14-15 (demerger formula split), Sl. No. 16 (Indian co. shares from foreign demerger), Sl. No. 17 (s. 9(10)(a) deemed-Indian shares). (III) ESOP/SWEAT-EQUITY: Sl. No. 4 — cost = FMV taken into account for perquisite-tax purposes (s. 17(1)(d)). (IV) BUSINESS-FORM CONVERSIONS: Sl. No. 5 — pvt./unlisted-public co. → LLP; partner's interest = pre-conversion shareholder's cost. Sl. Nos. 18-19 — stock exchange demutualisation. (V) MUTUAL FUND MECHANICS: Sl. Nos. 8, 10 (consolidated scheme/plan unit-cost), Sl. Nos. 11-12 (segregated portfolio formula split). (VI) SPECIFIC SECURITY MECHANICS: Sl. No. 3 (debenture conversion), Sl. No. 6 (GDR redemption — market price on redemption-request date), Sl. No. 9 (preference → equity conversion). (VII) SPECIAL ASSETS: Sl. No. 7 (business trust units), Sl. No. 13 (PSU JV interest swap), Sl. No. 20 (co-op bank reorganisation), Sl. Nos. 23-24 (Electronic Gold Receipts).
KEY DEFINITIONS (Sub-section 2)
'Previous owner' — for Sl. No. 1, the LAST previous owner who acquired the asset by a mode OTHER than those in column B (i.e., trace back through chain of gratuitous transfers to the original purchase-for-consideration). 'Main / segregated / total portfolio' — per SEBI Circular IMD/DF2/CIR/P/2018/160 (28-Dec-2018). 'Net worth' — paid-up share capital + general reserves of demerged co., per books, immediately before demerger. Sub-section (2)(d) extends Sl. Nos. 2, 14, 15 mutatis mutandis to co-operative bank reorganisations under s. 64.
CASE LAW
CIT v. Manjula J. Shah (Bom HC, 2011) — for inherited assets, indexation cost-of-acquisition is computed from year of FIRST holding by previous owner, NOT year of inheritance — strongly pro-assessee. Codified principle still applies under s. 73 read with s. 90. DCIT v. Smt. Meena Devi Agarwal — gift-cost-basis = donor's cost + improvement; donor's holding-period clubs. B.C. Srinivasa Setty v. CIT (SC) — where machinery section (cost determination) fails, charging-section also fails. CIT v. Dempo & Co. P. Ltd (SC) — for self-generated goodwill, NIL cost rule (Sl. No. 21 substantive equivalent) applies.
PLANNING NOTES
(i) Inherited assets: ALWAYS use Manjula J. Shah indexation principle — index from year of original acquisition, not year of inheritance. (ii) For ESOP/sweat-equity (Sl. No. 4), cost = FMV-at-perquisite-date — maintain Form 12BA / TDS proof. (iii) For demerger / amalgamation, document the formula inputs (net book value of transferred assets, net worth of demerged co. immediately before demerger) — these are scrutiny-magnets. (iv) For stock-exchange-demutualisation trading rights (Sl. No. 18) — cost is NIL by statutory fiction; full sale-proceeds become CG. (v) For Electronic Gold Receipts (Sl. Nos. 23-24), cost continuity preserves no-tax-arbitrage between physical gold and EGR; maintain depository chain-of-custody documentation.
CROSS-REFERENCES